The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cannabis dependence in young adults: an Australian population study
Abstract
Objectives The symptomatology of cannabis dependence remains ill‐defined and its importance controversial. Compared with alcohol dependence, the symptom profile of cannabis dependence has received little attention. We aimed to (a) report cannabis use in a representative population of young adults, (b) examine cannabis dependence symptoms according to frequency in the dependence syndrome and (c) contrast the symptomatology of cannabis and alcohol syndromes. Methods 1601 young adults (mean age 20.7 years) from an Australian longitudinal cohort study (N = 2032) were surveyed in 1998. Regular substance users were assessed for DSM‐IV cannabis and alcohol dependence. Prevalence estimates allowed for sampling variation and attrition. Results Fifty‐nine per cent reported life‐time use of cannabis, 17% used at least weekly and 7% (11% males, 4% females) met criteria for cannabis dependence. Symptom prevalence in dependent cannabis users was: persistent desire 91%; unintentional use 84%; withdrawal 74%; excessive time obtaining/using 74%; continued use despite health problems 63%; tolerance 21%; and social consequences 18%. The combination of withdrawal, persistent desire and unintentional use was reported by 57%. Dependent cannabis users reported compulsive and out‐of‐control use more frequently than dependent alcohol users, withdrawal similarly and tolerance considerably less often. Conclusions Cannabis use appears to be normative behaviour in young Australians. Progression beyond weekly use of cannabis carries a significant risk of dependence that should be considered in the public health response. The differing profiles of cannabis and alcohol dependence, particularly with regard to craving, draws attention to the need for further study of cannabis dependence as an important and distinct disorder in young adults.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anthony, J. C., Warner, L. A., & Kessler, R. C. (1994) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/1064-1297.2.3.244 · Cited by 1,341
Cited by
(2009) · Cited by 2,013
Prevalence of the Addictions: A Problem of the Majority or the Minority?
Sussman, S., Lisha, N., & Griffiths, M. (2011) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278710380124 · Cited by 598
Puberty as a highly vulnerable developmental period for the consequences of cannabis exposure
Schneider, M. (2008) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00110.x · Cited by 316
Reliability and validity of a short form of the Marijuana Craving Questionnaire
Heishman, S. J., Evans, R. J., Singleton, E. G., Levin, K. H., Copersino, M. L., & Gorelick, D. A. (2009) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.12.010 · Cited by 212
Dennis, M. L., Funk, R., Godley, S. H., Godley, M. D., & Waldron, H. (2004) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00859.x · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Coffey, C., Carlin, J. B., Degenhardt, L., Lynskey, M., Sanci, L., & Patton, G. C.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-194
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2111649782
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cannabis dependence in young adults: an Australian population study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00029.x
- The paper
- Coffey, C., Carlin, J. B., Degenhardt, L., Lynskey, M., Sanci, L., & Patton, G. C. (2002). Cannabis dependence in young adults: an Australian population study. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00029.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.