Marlatt's taxonomy and scoring rules as amended for use in the relapse replication and extension project
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals who have planned how to cope with risky situations are more likely to maintain newly adopted behaviour in the face of difficulties.
“Individuals who have planned how to cope with risky situations are more likely to maintain newly adopted behaviour in the face of difficulties (Marlatt, 1996;Simkin & Gross, 1996;Sniehotta, Scholz & Schwarzer, 2006;Ziegelmann, Lippke & Schwarzer, 2006).”
From Development and exploratory cluster-randomised opportunistic trial of a theory-based intervention to enhance physical activity among adolescents (2009) · cites this paper as Marlatt, 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Araújo-Soares, V., McIntyre, T., MacLennan, G., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2009) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870440802040707 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
- Authors
- MARLATT, G. A., STOUT, R. L., & ZYWIAK, W. H.
- ORCID
- STOUT, ROBERT L.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 12s1
- Pages
- 241-244
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2031655633
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Addiction (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Keywords
- relapse, relapse prevention, recurrence prediction, scoring rules
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
