The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence—a genomics perspective
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The functions of phenylpropanoid compounds in plant defence range from preformed or inducible physical and chemical barriers against infection to signal molecules involved in local and systemic signalling for defence gene induction. Defensive functions are not restricted to a particular class of phenylpropanoid compound, but are found in the simple hydroxycinnamic acids and monolignols through to the more complex flavonoids, isoflavonoids, and stilbenes. The enzymatic steps involved in the biosynthesis of the major classes of phenylpropanoid compounds are now well established, and many of the corresponding genes have been cloned. Less is understood about the regulatory genes that orchestrate rapid, coordinated induction of phenylpropanoid defences in response to microbial attack. Many of the biosynthetic pathway enzymes are encoded by gene families, but the specific functions of individual family members remain to be determined. The availability of the complete genome sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana , and the extensive expressed sequence tag (EST) resources in other species, such as rice, soybean, barrel medic, and tomato, allow, for the first time, a full appreciation of the comparative genetic complexity of the phenylpropanoid pathway across species. In addition, gene expression array analysis and metabolic profiling approaches make possible comparative parallel analyses of global changes at the genome and metabolome levels, facilitating an understanding of the relationships between changes in specific transcripts and subsequent alterations in metabolism in response to infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two Classes of Plant Antibiotics: Phytoalexins versus "Phytoanticipins"
VanEtten, H. D., Mansfield, J. W., Bailey, J. A., & Farmer, E. E. (1994) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.6.9.1191 · Cited by 710
Cited by
Ongena, M., Jourdan, E., Adam, A., Paquot, M., Brans, A., Joris, B., Arpigny, J., & Thonart, P. (2007) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01202.x · Cited by 855
Pourcel, L., Routaboul, J.-M., Kerhoas, L., Caboche, M., Lepiniec, L., & Debeaujon, I. (2005) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.105.035154 · Cited by 490
Lignin and Biomass: A Negative Correlation for Wood Formation and Lignin Content in Trees
Novaes, E., Kirst, M., Chiang, V., Winter-Sederoff, H., & Sederoff, R. (2010) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.161281 · Cited by 421
Genome-wide analysis of phenylpropanoid defence pathways.
NAOUMKINA, M. A., ZHAO, Q., GALLEGO‐GIRALDO, L., DAI, X., ZHAO, P. X., & DIXON, R. A. (2010) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00648.x · Cited by 410
Self-citationPlant Phenylalanine/Tyrosine Ammonia-lyases
Barros, J., & Dixon, R. A. (2020) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.09.011 · Cited by 348
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dixon, R. A., Achnine, L., Kota, P., Liu, C., Reddy, M. S. S., & Wang, L.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-08-30
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 371-390
- ISSN
- 1364-3703 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-6722
- OpenAlex
- W2124697128
- Cited by
- 1,487
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence—a genomics perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00131.x
- The paper
- Dixon, R. A., Achnine, L., Kota, P., Liu, C., Reddy, M. S. S., & Wang, L. (2002). The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence—a genomics perspective. Molecular Plant Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00131.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.