The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surfactin and fengycin lipopeptides of Bacillus subtilis as elicitors of induced systemic resistance in plants
Abstract
Summary: Multiple strains of Bacillus spp. were demonstrated to stimulate plant defence responses. However, very little is known about the nature of molecular determinants secreted by these Gram‐positive bacteria that are responsible for the elicitation of the induced systemic resistance (ISR) phenomenon. This study shows that the lipopeptides surfactins and fengycins may be involved in this elicitation process. In bean, pure fengycins and surfactins provided a significant ISR‐mediated protective effect on bean plants, similar to the one induced by living cells of the producing strain S499. Moreover, experiments conducted on bean and tomato plants showed that overexpression of both surfactin and fengycin biosynthetic genes in the naturally poor producer Bacillus subtilis strain 168 was associated with a significant increase in the potential of the derivatives to induce resistance. In tomato cells, key enzymes of the lipoxygenase pathway appeared to be activated in resistant plants following induction by lipopeptide overproducers. To our knowledge, such lipopeptides constitute a novel class of compounds from non‐pathogenic bacteria that can be perceived by plant cells as signals to initiate defence mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis.
Kunst, F., Ogasawara, N., Moszer, I., Albertini, A. M., Alloni, G., Azevedo, V., Bertero, M. G., Bessières, P., Bolotin, A., Borchert, S., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36786 · Cited by 3,679
Self-citationDurrant, W. E., & Dong, X. (2004) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421 · Cited by 3,184
Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads
Haas, D., & Défago, G. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1129 · Cited by 2,598
SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE INDUCED BY RHIZOSPHERE BACTERIA
van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (1998) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453 · Cited by 2,361
REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSFORMATION IN BACILLUS SUBTILIS
Anagnostopoulos, C., & Spizizen, J. (1961) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.81.5.741-746.1961 · Cited by 2,165
Induced Systemic Resistance and Promotion of Plant Growth by Bacillus spp.
Kloepper, J. W., Ryu, C.-M., & Zhang, S. (2004) · Phytopathology® · doi:10.1094/phyto.2004.94.11.1259 · Cited by 1,691
The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence—a genomics perspective
Dixon, R. A., Achnine, L., Kota, P., Liu, C., Reddy, M. S. S., & Wang, L. (2002) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00131.x · Cited by 1,487
Essential Bacillus subtilis genes
Kobayashi, K., Ehrlich, S. D., Albertini, A., Amati, G., Andersen, K. K., Arnaud, M., Asai, K., Ashikaga, S., Aymerich, S., Bessieres, P., et al. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0730515100 · Cited by 1,328
Bacterial Volatiles Induce Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis
Ryu, C.-M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C.-H., Reddy, M. S., Kloepper, J. W., & Paré, P. W. (2004) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.103.026583 · Cited by 1,308
Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences
Nürnberger, T., Brunner, F., Kemmerling, B., & Piater, L. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0119.x · Cited by 1,286
Cited by
Raaijmakers, J. M., De Bruijn, I., Nybroe, O., & Ongena, M. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00221.x · Cited by 1,131
Self-citationChen, X. H., Koumoutsi, A., Scholz, R., Eisenreich, A., Schneider, K., Heinemeyer, I., Morgenstern, B., Voss, B., Hess, W. R., Reva, O., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1325 · Cited by 873
Pérez-García, A., Romero, D., & de Vicente, A. (2011) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.12.003 · Cited by 586
Cawoy, H., Debois, D., Franzil, L., De Pauw, E., Thonart, P., & Ongena, M. (2015) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.12238 · Cited by 332
Self-citationBacillus for Plant Growth Promotion and Stress Resilience: What Have We Learned?
Tsotetsi, T., Nephali, L., Malebe, M., & Tugizimana, F. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11192482 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Ongena, M., Jourdan, E., Adam, A., Paquot, M., Brans, A., Joris, B., Arpigny, J., & Thonart, P.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1084-1090
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2020433912
- Cited by
- 855
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 18.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surfactin and fengycin lipopeptides of Bacillus subtilis as elicitors of induced systemic resistance in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01202.x
- The paper
- Ongena, M., Jourdan, E., Adam, A., Paquot, M., Brans, A., Joris, B., Arpigny, J., & Thonart, P. (2007). Surfactin and fengycin lipopeptides of Bacillus subtilis as elicitors of induced systemic resistance in plants. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01202.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
