The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori with a new sequential treatment
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Background : Eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori with standard triple therapy are disappointing, and studies from several countries confirm this poor performance. Aim : To assess the eradication rate of a new sequential treatment regimen compared with conventional triple therapy for the eradication of H. pylori infection. Methods : One thousand and forty‐nine dyspeptic patients were studied prospectively. H. pylori‐infected patients were randomized to receive 10‐day sequential therapy [rabeprazole (40 mg daily) plus amoxicillin (1 g twice daily) for the first 5 days, followed by rabeprazole (20 mg), clarithromycin (500 mg) and tinidazole (500 mg) twice daily for the remaining 5 days] or standard 7‐day treatment [rabeprazole (20 mg), clarithromycin (500 mg) and amoxicillin (1 g) twice daily]. H. pylori status was assessed by histology, rapid urease test and 13 C‐urea breath test at baseline and 6 weeks or more after completion of treatment. Results : Higher eradication rates were found with the sequential regimen compared to the standard regimen (intention‐to‐treat: 92% vs. 74%, P < 0.0001; per protocol: 95% vs. 77%, P < 0.0001). Higher eradication rates were also seen in patients with peptic ulcer disease and non‐ulcer dyspepsia. In both treatments, compliance was similar (> 90%), as was the rate of side‐effects, which were mild. Conclusions : This 10‐day sequential treatment regimen achieves high eradication rates in peptic ulcer disease and non‐ulcer dyspepsia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Classification and Grading of Gastritis: The Updated Sydney System
Dixon, M. F., Genta, R. M., Yardley, J. H., & Correa, P. (1996) · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/00000478-199610000-00001 · Cited by 5,185
Cited by
A Report Card to Grade Helicobacter pylori Therapy
Graham, D. Y., Lu, H., & Yamaoka, Y. (2007) · Helicobacter · doi:10.1111/j.1523-5378.2007.00518.x · Cited by 393
Nista, E. C., Candelli, M., Cremonini, F., Cazzato, I. A., Zocco, M. A., Franceschi, F., Cammarota, G., Gasbarrini, G., & Gasbarrini, A. (2004) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02274.x · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Zullo, A., Vaira, D., Vakil, N., Hassan, C., Gatta, L., Ricci, C., De Francesco, V., Menegatti, M., Tampieri, A., Perna, F., Rinaldi, V., Perri, F., Papadìa, C., Fornari, F., Pilati, S., Mete, L. S., Merla, A., Potì, R., Marinone, G., Savioli, A., Campo, S. M. A., Faleo, D., Ierardi, E., Miglioli, M., & Morini, S.
- Venue
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02-28
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 719-726
- ISSN
- 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2036
- OpenAlex
- W2002580298
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori with a new sequential treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01461.x
- The paper
- Zullo, A., Vaira, D., Vakil, N., Hassan, C., Gatta, L., Ricci, C., De Francesco, V., Menegatti, M., Tampieri, A., Perna, F., Rinaldi, V., Perri, F., Papadìa, C., Fornari, F., Pilati, S., Mete, L. S., Merla, A., Potì, R., Marinone, G., . . . Morini, S. (2003). High eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori with a new sequential treatment. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01461.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.