The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The autologous serum skin test: a screening test for autoantibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria
Abstract
One-third of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) have circulating functional autoantibodies against the high affinity IgE receptor FcepsilonRI, or IgE. The intradermal injection of autologous serum causes a weal and flare reaction in many patients with CIU, and this reaction forms the basis of the autologous serum skin test (ASST). We have determined the parameters of the ASST which define the optimal sensitivity and specificity for the identification of patients with autoantibodies. Two physicians (R.A. S. and C.E.H.G.) performed ASSTs in a total of 155 patients with CIU, 40 healthy control subjects, 15 patients with dermographism, nine with cholinergic urticaria and 10 with atopic eczema. Patients were classified as having functional autoantibodies by demonstrating in vitro serum-evoked histamine release from the basophils of two healthy donors. There were significant differences (P < 0.001) in the mean weal diameter, weal volume, weal redness and flare area of the intradermal serum-induced cutaneous responses at 30 min between patients with CIU with autoantibodies and either those without autoantibodies or control subjects. The optimum combined sensitivity and specificity of the ASST was obtained if a positive test was defined as a red serum-induced weal with a diameter of >/= 1.5 mm than the saline-induced response at 30 min. For R.A.S. and C.E.H.G., the ASST sensitivity was 65% and 71% and specificity was 81% and 78%, respectively. Using these criteria, the following subjects had positive ASSTs: none of 15 dermographics, none of 10 atopics, one of nine cholinergics and one of 40 controls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zuberbier, T., Aberer, W., Asero, R., Bindslev‐Jensen, C., Brzoza, Z., Canonica, G. W., Church, M. K., Ensina, L. F., Giménez‐Arnau, A., Godse, K., et al. (2014) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.12313 · Cited by 1,203
EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline: definition, classification and diagnosis of urticaria
Zuberbier, T., Asero, R., Bindslev‐Jensen, C., Walter Canonica, G., Church, M. K., Giménez‐Arnau, A., Grattan, C. E. H., Kapp, A., Merk, H. F., Rogala, B., et al. (2009) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02179.x · Cited by 731
Toubi, E., Kessel, A., Avshovich, N., Bamberger, E., Sabo, E., Nusem, D., & Panasoff, J. (2004) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00473.x · Cited by 299
Psychosocial factors and chronic spontaneous urticaria: a systematic review
Ben‐Shoshan, M., Blinderman, I., & Raz, A. (2013) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.12068 · Cited by 86
Hergüner, S., Kılıç, G., Karakoç, S., Tamay, Z., Tüzün, Ü., & Güler, N. (2011) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10138.x · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- SABROE, GRATTAN, FRANCIS, BARR, BLACK, K., & GREAVES
- Venue
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 446-452
- ISSN
- 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2133
- OpenAlex
- W2015480696
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The autologous serum skin test: a screening test for autoantibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02707.x
- The paper
- SABROE, GRATTAN, FRANCIS, BARR, BLACK, K., & GREAVES. (1999). The autologous serum skin test: a screening test for autoantibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02707.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.