Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guidelines for topical photodynamic therapy: report of a workshop of the British Photodermatology Group

Morton, C.A., Brown, S.B., Collins, S., Ibbotson, S., Jenkinson, H., Kurwa, H., Langmack, K., Mckenna, K., Moseley, H., Pearse, A.D., Stringer, M., Taylor, D.K., Wong, G., Rhodes, L.E.·2002·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is effective in the treatment of certain non-melanoma skin cancers and is under evaluation in other dermatoses. Its development has been enhanced by a low rate of adverse events and good cosmesis. 5-Aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) is the main agent used, converted within cells into the photosensitizer protoporphyrin IX, with surface illumination then triggering the photodynamic reaction. Despite the relative simplicity of the technique, accurate dosimetry in PDT is complicated by multiple variables in drug formulation, delivery and duration of application, in addition to light-specific parameters. Several non-coherent and coherent light sources are effective in PDT. Optimal disease-specific irradiance, wavelength and total dose characteristics have yet to be established, and are compounded by difficulties comparing light sources. The carcinogenic risk of ALA-PDT appears to be low. Current evidence indicates topical PDT to be effective in actinic keratoses on the face and scalp, Bowen's disease and superficial basal cell carcinomas (BCCs). PDT may prove advantageous where size, site or number of lesions limits the efficacy and/or acceptability of conventional therapies. Topical ALA-PDT alone is a relatively poor option for both nodular BCCs and squamous cell carcinomas. Experience of the modality in other skin diseases remains limited; areas where there is potential benefit include viral warts, acne, psoriasis and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. A recent British Photodermatology Group workshop considered published evidence on topical PDT in order to establish guidelines to promote the efficacy and safety of this increasingly practised treatment modality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04719.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Morton, C. A., Brown, S. B., Collins, S., Ibbotson, S., Jenkinson, H., Kurwa, H., Langmack, K., Mckenna, K., Moseley, H., Pearse, A. D., Stringer, M., Taylor, D. K., Wong, G., & Rhodes, L. E.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2002-04
Volume
146
Issue
4
Pages
552-567
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W2037429015
Cited by
451
References
5
FWCI
27.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for topical photodynamic therapy: report of a workshop of the British Photodermatology Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04719.x
The paper
Morton, C. A., Brown, S. B., Collins, S., Ibbotson, S., Jenkinson, H., Kurwa, H., Langmack, K., Mckenna, K., Moseley, H., Pearse, A. D., Stringer, M., Taylor, D. K., Wong, G., & Rhodes, L. E. (2002). Guidelines for topical photodynamic therapy: report of a workshop of the British Photodermatology Group. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04719.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.