The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy
Abstract
Background: Inadvertent enterotomy is a feared complication of adhesiotomy during abdominal reoperation. The nature and extent of this adhesion-associated problem are unknown. Methods: The records of all patients who underwent reoperation between July 1995 and September 1997 were reviewed retrospectively for inadvertent enterotomy, risk factors were analysed using univariate and multivariate parameters, and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were assessed. Results: Inadvertent enterotomy occurred in 52 (19 per cent) of 270 reoperations. Dividing adhesions in the lower abdomen and pelvis, in particular, caused bowel injury. In univariate analysis body mass index was significantly higher in patients with inadvertent enterotomy (mean(s.d.) 25·5(4·6) kg/m2) than in those without enterotomy (21·9(4·3) kg/m2) (P < 0·03). Patient age and three or more previous laparotomies appeared to be independent parameters predicting inadvertent enterotomy (odds ratio (95 per cent confidence interval) 1·9 (1·3–2·7) and 10·4 (5·0–21·6) respectively; P < 0·001). Patients with inadvertent enterotomy had significantly more postoperative complications (P < 0·01) and urgent relaparotomies (P < 0·001), a higher rate of admission to the intensive care unit (P < 0·001) and parenteral nutrition usage (P < 0·001), and a longer postoperative hospital stay (P < 0·001). Conclusion: The incidence of inadvertent enterotomy during reoperation is high. This adhesion-related complication has an impact on postoperative morbidity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions
Van Goor, H. (2007) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01358.x · Cited by 320
Self-citationAbdominal adhesion prevention: Still a sticky subject
Lauder, C. I. W., Garcea, G., Strickland, A., & Maddern, G. J. (2010) · Digestive Surgery · doi:10.1159/000314805 · Cited by 89
Fucoidan Film Safely Inhibits Surgical Adhesions in a Rat Model
Cashman, J. D., Kennah, E., Shuto, A., Winternitz, C., & Springate, C. M. K. (2011) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2010.04.043 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Krabben, A. A., Dijkstra, F. R., Nieuwenhuijzen, M., Reijnen, M. M. P. J., Schaapveld, M., & van Goor, H.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 467-471
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W1992078572
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01394.x
- The paper
- van der Krabben, A. A., Dijkstra, F. R., Nieuwenhuijzen, M., Reijnen, M. M. P. J., Schaapveld, M., & van Goor, H. (2000). Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01394.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.