Cited by 95Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The construct validity of the Griffiths Scales of Mental Development

Luiz, D M, Foxcroft, C D, Stewart, R·2001·Child Care Health and Development

Abstract

The aim of this study was to contribute to our knowledge of the construct validity of the Griffiths Scales of Mental Development (Griffiths Scales) through an examination of the underlying dimensions tapped by the six subscales, using Common Factor Analysis. A sample of 430 South African children, from four ethnic groups (i. e. White, Mixed Race, Asian and Black) participated. The correlation coefficients obtained for the South African groups were compared to those Griffiths obtained in her work with the British standardization sample of the Griffiths Scales. The pattern of correlation for South African and British subjects was found to be similar. This suggests that the Scales are measuring a construct which is consistent across cultures and through time. A factor analysis was performed with the data for each South African ethnic group separately and the factor solutions were compared to determine whether the Griffiths Scales measure similar or different constructs for the groups. The results indicate that the Griffiths Scales tend to measure one factor, and including only common variables, the factor appears to be similar cross-culturally.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2001.00158.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Chan D. W., 1996, The two‐ and three‐dimensional model of the HK‐WISC: a confirmatory factor analysis., Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 28, 191
  2. Claassen N. C. W., 1983, Verslag oor die funksionering van die NSAG Intermedier G in verskillende bevolkingsgroege. Office Report no. 1983–1988.
  3. Pretoria: HSRC. Crawford‐Nutt D. H., 1976, Are black scores on the Raven’s Progressive Matrices an artefact of test presentation?, Psychologica Africana, 16, 01
  4. Dixon W. J., 1990, BMDP Statistical Software Manual.
  5. Fouche F. A., 1974, The development of psychological tests for different ethnic groups in South Africa., Hiroshima Forum for Psychology, 1, 35
  6. Foxcroft C. D.(1985) The use of the Reitan‐Indiana Neuropsychological Test Battery in South Africa: A cross ethnic comparison of normal pre‐school children. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation University of Port Elizabeth.
  7. Griffiths R., 1970, The Abilities of Young Children.
  8. Griffiths R., 1984, The Abilities of Young Children.
  9. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1987.tb00535.x · DOI
  10. Heimes L.(1983) The comparison of the JSAIS and the Griffiths Developmental Scale scores of 3–5 year old boys and girls. Unpublished master’s Thesis University of Port Elizabeth.
  11. Luiz D. M.(1994) Multicultural factors in the use of the Griffiths Scales: A comparative study. Paper Presented at the Tutor Conference of the ARICD Manchester.
  12. Richter L. M., 1987, Parameters of the Urban Black Population in South Africa of Relevance to the Standardization of Three Sets of Child Development Measures. (Technical Report no. 87–02).
  13. Riordan Z. V. A.(1978) Locus of control in South Africa: A cross‐ethnic study. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation University of Port Elizabeth.
  14. Schlodder M. I., 1986, Lonitudinalstudie uber wachstum und entwicklung von fruh und reifgeborenen kineren von der geburt bis zum 6 lebensjahr. Forschungsberichte des Landes Nordrhein‐Westfalen Nr. 2691.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Luiz, D. M., Foxcroft, C. D., & Stewart, R.
Affiliations
Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Luiz, D M
Venue
Child Care Health and Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
73-83
ISSN
  • 0305-1862 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2214
OpenAlex
W1524739797
Cited by
95
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Care Health and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
construct validity, cognitive development, intelligence testing, factor structure, cross-cultural validity, South African children, ethnic groups
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Ethnicity, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Mental Processes, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review