The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interleukin‐10 generation in atopic children following oral Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
Abstract
Oral Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ingestion for 5 days to 4 weeks has been shown to alleviate clinical symptoms of gastrointestinal inflammation and atopic dermatitis. To determine whether oral Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG may act by generating immunosuppressive mediator in atopic children. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) at a daily dose of 2 × 10 10 cfu was added for 4 weeks to the diets of nine children (mean age, 21 months) with atopic dermatitis. Blood and faecal samples were collected before supplementation and at early (2 weeks) and late stage (4 and 8 weeks from the beginning). The concentrations of interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), IL‐10, IL‐12, tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNFα) and interferon‐γ (IFNγ) in sera, as well as the production of IL‐2, IL‐4, IL‐10 and IFNγ in mitogen‐induced peripheral blood mononuclear cells, were assessed. Secretory IgA and TNFα were also determined in faeces. The serum IL‐10 concentration differed significantly between before, early and late samples (P < 0.001) due to the elevation of serum IL‐10 in the later phase of oral Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ingestion. The enhancement of IL‐10 production in mitogen‐induced cultures preceded the rise in serum IL‐10. The enhanced IL‐10 generation in vivo substantiates the anti‐inflammatory properties of specific probiotic bacteria strains, and provides an additional reason for considering such treatments for patients with intestinal inflammation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional food science and gastrointestinal physiology and function
Salminen, S., Bouley, C., Boutron, M.-C., Cummings, J. H., Franck, A., Gibson, G. R., Isolauri, E., Moreau, M.-C., Roberfroid, M., & Rowland, I. (1998) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19980108 · Cited by 1,398
Self-citation
Cited by
Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health
Parvez, S., Malik, K. A., Ah Kang, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (2006) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02963.x · Cited by 1,435
Distinct patterns of neonatal gut microflora in infants in whom atopy was and was not developing
Kalliomäki, M., Kirjavainen, P., Eerola, E., Kero, P., Salminen, S., & Isolauri, E. (2001) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1067/mai.2001.111237 · Cited by 1,255
Self-citationPsychobiotics and the manipulation of bacteria–gut–brain signals
Sarkar, A., Lehto, S. M., Harty, S., Dinan, T. G., Cryan, J. F., & Burnet, P. W. J. (2016) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2016.09.002 · Cited by 1,068
The germless theory of allergic disease: revisiting the hygiene hypothesis
Wills-Karp, M., Santeliz, J., & Karp, C. L. (2001) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/35095579 · Cited by 788
Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks?
Boyle, R. J., Robins-Browne, R. M., & Tang, M. L. (2006) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1256 · Cited by 776
Metadata
- Authors
- Pessi, T., Sütas, Y., Hurme, M., & Isolauri, E.
- Venue
- Clinical & Experimental Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1804-1808
- ISSN
- 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2063720477
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interleukin‐10 generation in atopic children following oral Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00948.x
- The paper
- Pessi, T., Sütas, Y., Hurme, M., & Isolauri, E. (2000). Interleukin‐10 generation in atopic children following oral Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00948.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.