Cited by 301Ovarian function and disordersReproductive Biology and FertilityAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evidence for a primary abnormality of thecal cell steroidogenesis in the polycystic ovary syndrome

Gilling‐Smith, C., Story, H, Rogers, V., Franks, S.·1997·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrinopathy of unknown aetiology. The aims of this study were to identify whether ovarian thecal cell steroidogenesis is abnormally regulated in PCOS by measuring steroid responses to a single dose of hCG before, and during, suppression of endogenous LH levels by GnRH analogue (GnRHa). DESIGN: Serum levels of LH, FSH, 17 alpha hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP), androstenedione, testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate were measured before, and 48 hours after, a single intramuscular injection of 10,000 IU hCG. The test was repeated 4 weeks after suppression of endogenous LH levels by GnRHa. PATIENTS: The ovarian responses to hCG were compared in three groups of women. Eleven women had normal ovaries and regular cycles, eight had polycystic ovaries but not clinical features of the syndrome (PCO group) and eight had polycystic ovaries, anovulation and either severe hirsutism or alopecia (PCOS group). RESULTS: Before GnRHa treatment, LH levels were significantly higher in the PCOS group but hCG stimulated a similar rise in 17OHP in all three groups. Following analogue, LH levels were suppressed in all three groups but the 17OHP responses to hCG were significantly higher in both the PCO and PCOS groups compared with normal controls. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide further evidence in favour of an intrinsic abnormality of thecal cell steroidogenesis in the polycystic ovary.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.2321049.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Gilling‐Smith, C., Story, H., Rogers, V., & Franks, S.
Affiliations
St Mary's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Gilling‐Smith, C.
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-07
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
93-99
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W2141227160
Cited by
301
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bayer Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, hCG stimulation test, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, GnRH analogues, LH suppression, androstenedione, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, hirsutism, anovulation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Androstenedione, Female, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Gonadotropins, Pituitary, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Middle Aged, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Testosterone, Theca Cells, Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, 17-alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review