Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams

Open access
CLAUSEN, BENTE, BIGGS, BARRY·1997·Freshwater Biology

Abstract

1. The objective of this study was to identify the most ecologically relevant hydrological indices for characterizing hydrological regimes in New Zealand streams. To do this we related measures of periphyton chlorophyll a, ash‐free dry mass (AFDM), species richness, and diversity and invertebrate density, species richness and diversity, to thirty‐four hydrological variables derived from daily flow records at eighty‐three sites. The hydrological variables included some describing average flow conditions, flow variability, floods, and low‐flow characteristics. 2. A principal components analysis showed that the interrelationship between many of the hydrological variables was high, and most variables correlated significantly with Principal Component 1 (PC1). The flood frequency variables formed a distinct component of the flow regime and were the main contributor to PC2. 3. We found that both the average flow conditions and some measure of variability were significantly related to most of the biological variables, and these individual hydrological variables were more strongly correlated to the biological measures than the composite principal components. Only four of the thirty‐four flow variables were significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with measures of periphyton biomass (chlorophyll a and AFDM), whereas twenty‐four variables were correlated with periphyton diversity. Conversely, thirty‐one of the thirty‐four flow variables were correlated with total invertebrate density, whereas only four variables correlated with diversity. 4. We selected the flood frequency (FRE 3), where a flood is defined as flows higher than three times the median flow, as the most ecological useful overall flow variable in New Zealand streams because it explained a significant amount of the variance in four out of the six main benthic community measures, and it had a clear mechanism of control of the biota which was commensurate with current stream ecosystem theory. Periphyton biomass decreased with increasing FRE 3, whereas invertebrate density had an increasing/curvilinear relationship with FRE 3. Periphyton species richness and diversity decreased with increasing FRE 3.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00230.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
CLAUSEN, B., & BIGGS, B.
Venue
Freshwater Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-10
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
327-342
ISSN
  • 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2427
OpenAlex
W2058445061
Cited by
290
References
17
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00230.x
The paper
CLAUSEN, B., & BIGGS, B. (1997). Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00230.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.