The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: This paper focuses on the premise that the habitat provides the templet upon which evolution forges characteristic species traits. Alternative hypotheses are that there are historic and phylogenetic constraints on the match between organism and environment. In our analysis of river systems, as one dimension of the templet we choose temporal heterogeneity and assume some relationship between this and the frequency of disturbance. The second dimension is spatial heterogeneity in the physicochemical environment and we pay particular attention to the way such variation can ameliorate the influence of disturbances through the provision of refugia. We derive predictions about the traits of species, including size, generation time, reproductive tactics, body form, mobility and potential for regeneration, that are likely to occur in particular regions of the two‐dimensional templet. We also present predictions about community‐level characteristics such as number of species per resource category and total species richness. The general predictions are intended to apply to a wide range of plants, micro‐organisms and animals, provided the measurements have been made at a scale appropriate to them. Hypotheses can be tested by comparing traits predicted for particular habitats, whose spatial and temporal heterogeneity have been quantified, with those actually observed. If the fit turns out to be good, we will be able to conclude that the habitat templet approach offers a sound framework within which to pose questions in river ecology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754
Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas
Stearns, S. C. (1976) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409052 · Cited by 3,557
CLADISTIC TESTS OF ADAPTATIONAL HYPOTHESES
Coddington, J. A. (1988) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00465.x · Cited by 438
Cited by
Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems
Allan, J. D. (2004) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122 · Cited by 3,626
Poff, N. L. (1997) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1468026 · Cited by 1,833
Adaptation to natural flow regimes
Lytle, D. A., & Poff, N. L. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.002 · Cited by 1,759
State of science: mental workload in ergonomics
Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2015) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.956151 · Cited by 948
Biodiversity of Stream Insects: Variation at Local, Basin, and Regional Scales
Vinson, M. R., & Hawkins, C. P. (1998) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.271 · Cited by 538
Metadata
- Authors
- TOWNSEND, C. R., & HILDREW, A. G.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-275
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W2057930778
- Cited by
- 1,186
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 29.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01740.x
- The paper
- TOWNSEND, C. R., & HILDREW, A. G. (1994). Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01740.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.