Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction

Open access
Townsend, Colin R., Dolédec, Sylvain, Norris, Richard, Peacock, Kathi, Arbuckle, Chris·2003·Freshwater Biology

Abstract

SUMMARY 1. We analysed an existing database of macroinvertebrates and fish in the context of a newly established geographical information system (GIS) of physical features to determine the relationships between stream community composition and physical factors measured at three landscape scales – catchment, reach and bedform. Both an exploratory (concordance analysis) and a predictive (ausrivas) approach were used. 2. The environmental variables that most successfully accounted for variation in macroinvertebrate assemblages were mainly ‘natural’ and at the catchment‐scale (relief ratio, basin diameter, etc.) but the human‐induced physical setting of percentage of pasture in the riparian zone was also influential. For fish, ‘natural’ variables were also dominant, but these were mostly at the bedform or reach scales and land use featured strongly. 3. Geographic location accounted for some of the variation in invertebrate assemblages, partly because geography and influential conditions/resources are correlated but also because different species may have evolved in different places and have not colonised every ‘ecologically appropriate’ location. Geographic location was not influential in accounting for variation in assemblages of strongly flying invertebrates, supporting the hypothesis that organisms having high dispersal potential can be expected to break down geographic barriers more readily than those with poor dispersal powers. In accord with what is known about the local evolution and restricted distributions of native and exotic species, history (reflected in geography) appeared to account for some variation in fish assemblages. 4. Given their different mathematical bases, the fact that exploratory and predictive analyses yielded similar results provides added confidence to our conclusions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01043.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Metadata

Authors
Townsend, C. R., Dolédec, S., Norris, R., Peacock, K., & Arbuckle, C.
Venue
Freshwater Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04-10
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
768-785
ISSN
  • 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2427
OpenAlex
W2135646483
Cited by
309
References
37
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01043.x
The paper
Townsend, C. R., Dolédec, S., Norris, R., Peacock, K., & Arbuckle, C. (2003). The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01043.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.