The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY 1. We analysed an existing database of macroinvertebrates and fish in the context of a newly established geographical information system (GIS) of physical features to determine the relationships between stream community composition and physical factors measured at three landscape scales – catchment, reach and bedform. Both an exploratory (concordance analysis) and a predictive (ausrivas) approach were used. 2. The environmental variables that most successfully accounted for variation in macroinvertebrate assemblages were mainly ‘natural’ and at the catchment‐scale (relief ratio, basin diameter, etc.) but the human‐induced physical setting of percentage of pasture in the riparian zone was also influential. For fish, ‘natural’ variables were also dominant, but these were mostly at the bedform or reach scales and land use featured strongly. 3. Geographic location accounted for some of the variation in invertebrate assemblages, partly because geography and influential conditions/resources are correlated but also because different species may have evolved in different places and have not colonised every ‘ecologically appropriate’ location. Geographic location was not influential in accounting for variation in assemblages of strongly flying invertebrates, supporting the hypothesis that organisms having high dispersal potential can be expected to break down geographic barriers more readily than those with poor dispersal powers. In accord with what is known about the local evolution and restricted distributions of native and exotic species, history (reflected in geography) appeared to account for some variation in fish assemblages. 4. Given their different mathematical bases, the fact that exploratory and predictive analyses yielded similar results provides added confidence to our conclusions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Poff, N. L. (1997) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1468026 · Cited by 1,833
ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software
Thioulouse, J., Chessel, D., Dole´dec, S., & Olivier, J.-M. (1997) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/a:1018513530268 · Cited by 1,620
Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance
Faith, D. P., Minchin, P. R., & Belbin, L. (1987) · Vegetatio · doi:10.1007/bf00038687 · Cited by 1,554
Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance
Faith, D. P., Minchin, P. R., & Belbin, L. (1987) · Theory and models in vegetation science · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4061-1_6 · Cited by 1,449
Population Ecology: A Unified Study of Animals and Plants
Begon, M., Mortimer, M., & Thompson, D. J. (1996) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444313765 · Cited by 995
Frutiger, A. (1984) · Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Hydrologie · doi:10.1007/bf02538108 · Cited by 980
A Unifying Tool for Linear Multivariate Statistical Methods: The RV- Coefficient
Robert, P., & Escoufier, Y. (1976) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2347233 · Cited by 977
A Note on the Use of Principal Components in Regression
Jolliffe, I. T. (1982) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2348005 · Cited by 829
Co‐inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species–environment relationships
DOLÉDEC, S., & CHESSEL, D. (1994) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01741.x · Cited by 802
Self-citationLandscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales
Roth, N. E., Allan, J. D., & Erickson, D. L. (1996) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf02447513 · Cited by 796
Cited by
Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems
Allan, J. D. (2004) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122 · Cited by 3,626
THOMPSON, R., & TOWNSEND, C. (2006) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01068.x · Cited by 370
Self-citationMykrä, H., Heino, J., & Muotka, T. (2007) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00272.x · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Townsend, C. R., Dolédec, S., Norris, R., Peacock, K., & Arbuckle, C.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-04-10
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 768-785
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W2135646483
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 12.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01043.x
- The paper
- Townsend, C. R., Dolédec, S., Norris, R., Peacock, K., & Arbuckle, C. (2003). The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01043.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.