The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The size–grain hypothesis and interspecific scaling in ants
Open accessAbstract
1. The size–grain hypothesis maintains that as terrestrial walking organisms decrease in size, their environment becomes less planar and more rugose. The benefits of long legs (efficient, speedy movement over a planar environment) may thus decrease with smaller body size, while the costs (larger cross‐sectional area limiting access to the interstitial environment) are enhanced. 2. A prediction from this hypothesis – that leg size should increase proportionately with body mass – is examined. Ants are among the smallest walking animals and extend the size gradient five orders of magnitude beyond the traditional ‘mouse to elephant’ curve. The mass of 135 species of worker ants spans 3·7 orders of magnitude (0·008–53 mg). Larger ants tended to be slimmer and longer legged. Ant subfamilies varied in their scaling relationships, but four out of five showed a positive allometry for hind leg length (b > 0·33). Mammals, in contrast, show isometry for leg length over six orders of magnitude. 3. It is suggested that ants make a transition from living in an interstitial environment when small to a planar environment when large, a habit continued by most terrestrial mammals. Head length and pronotum width are robust estimators of mass in ants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Body size variation in insects: a macroecological perspective
Chown, S. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2009.00097.x · Cited by 772
Flea-Inspired Catapult Mechanism for Miniature Jumping Robots
Noh, M., Kim, S.-W., An, S., Koh, J.-S., & Cho, K.-J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2012.2198510 · Cited by 272
Scaling of insect metabolic rate is inconsistent with the nutrient supply network model
CHOWN, S. L., MARAIS, E., TERBLANCHE, J. S., KLOK, C. J., LIGHTON, J. R. B., & BLACKBURN, T. M. (2007) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01245.x · Cited by 253
Arboreal ant abundance tracks primary productivity in an Amazonian whitewater river system
Pringle, E. G., Santos, T. F. D., Gonçalves, M. S., Hawes, J. E., Peres, C. A., & Baccaro, F. B. (2019) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2902 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaspari, M., & Weiser, M. D.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 530-538
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2435
- OpenAlex
- W2131558485
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The size–grain hypothesis and interspecific scaling in ants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00343.x
- The paper
- Kaspari, M., & Weiser, M. D. (1999). The size–grain hypothesis and interspecific scaling in ants. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00343.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.