Cited by 174Marine animal studies overviewAvian ecology and behaviorMarine and fisheries research

Apex marine predator declines ninety percent in association with changing oceanic climate

VEIT, RICHARD, MCGOWAN, JOHN, AINLEY, DAVID, WAHL, TERENCE, PYLE, PETER·1997·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Three time series of pelagic bird abundance collected in disparate portions of the California Current reveal a 90% decline in Sooty Shearwater (Puffinus griseus) abundance between 1987 and 1994. This decline is negatively correlated with a concurrent rise in sea‐surface temperatures; Sooty Shearwaters have declined while sea temperatures have risen. There is a nine‐month lag in the response by shearwaters to changing temperatures. The geographical scale of our study demonstrates that the decline of Sooty Shearwaters is not a localized phenomenon, nor can it be ascribed to a short‐term distributional shift. The Sooty Shearwater is the numerically dominant species of the California Current System (CCS) in summer (austral winter), with an estimated population in the late 1970s of 5 million individuals. If the observed warming of the waters of the California Current System is an irreversible manifestation of a changing global climate, then the impact upon Sooty Shearwater populations seems likely to be profound.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1997.d01-130.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ocean warming associated with climate change has precipitated bottom-up trophic cascades that have restructured both benthic and pelagic food webs and driven declines in shearwaters and auklets.

    “More recently, ocean warming associated with climate change has precipitated bottom-up trophic cascades, analogous to those proposed here for terrestrial systems, which have restructured both benthic and pelagic food webs and driven declines in shearwaters and auklets (112–114).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VEIT, R., MCGOWAN, J., AINLEY, D., WAHL, T., & PYLE, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
  • H.T. Harvey & Associates (US)
  • Point Blue Conservation Science (US)
Corresponding author
VEIT, RICHARD
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-02
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
23-28
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2123890019
Cited by
174
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
sooty shearwater, Puffinus griseus, population decline (ecology), sea surface temperature, ocean warming, California Current System, pelagic seabirds, climate change, population time series

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review