Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 390

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Influence of O2availability on NO and N2O release by nitrification and denitrification in soils

Bollmann, Annette, Conrad, Ralf·1998·Global Change Biology

Abstract

The availability of O 2 is believed to be one of the main factors regulating nitrification and denitrification and the release of NO and N 2 O. The availability of O 2 in soil is controlled by the O 2 partial pressure in the gas phase and by the moisture content in the soil. Therefore, we investigated the influence of O 2 partial pressures and soil moisture contents on the NO and N 2 O release in a sandy and a loamy silt and differentiated between nitrification and denitrification by selective inhibition of nitrification with 10 Pa acetylene. At 60% whc (maximum water holding capacity) NO and N 2 O release by denitrification increased with decreasing O 2 partial pressure and reached a maximum under anoxic conditions. Under anoxic conditions NO and N 2 O were only released by denitrification. NO and N 2 O release by nitrification also increased with decreasing O 2 partial pressure, but reached a maximum at 0.1–0.5% O 2 and then decreased again. Nitrification was the main source of NO and N 2 O at O 2 partial pressures higher than 0.1–0.5% O 2. At lower O 2 partial pressures denitrification was the main source of NO and N 2 O. With decreasing O 2 partial pressure N 2 O release increased more than NO release, indicating that the N 2 O release was more sensitive against O 2 than the NO release. At ambient O 2 partial pressure (20.5% O 2) NO and N 2 O release by denitrification increased with increasing soil moisture content. The maximum NO and N 2 O release was observed at soil moisture contents of 65–80% whc and 100% whc, respectively. NO and N 2 O release by nitrification also increased with increasing soil moisture content with a maximum at 45–55% whc and 90% whc, respectively. Nitrification was the main source of NO and N 2 O at soil moisture contents lower than 90% whc and 80% whc, respectively. Higher soil moisture contents favoured NO and N 2 O release by denitrification. Soil texture had also an effect on the release of NO and N 2 O. The coarse‐textured sandy silt released more NO than N 2 O compared with the fine‐textured loamy silt. At high soil moisture contents (80–100% whc) the fine‐textured soil showed a higher N 2 O release by denitrification than the coarse‐textured soil. We assume that the fine‐textured soil became anoxic at a lower soil moisture content than the coarse‐textured soil. In conclusion, the effects of O 2 partial pressure, soil moisture and soil texture were consistent with the theory that denitrification increasingly contributes to the release of NO and in particular N 2 O when conditions for soil microorganisms become increasingly anoxic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00161.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 390

Metadata

Authors
Bollmann, A., & Conrad, R.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-04
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
387-396
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2162826322
Cited by
390
References
0
FWCI
11.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of O2availability on NO and N2O release by nitrification and denitrification in soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00161.x
The paper
Bollmann, A., & Conrad, R. (1998). Influence of O2availability on NO and N2O release by nitrification and denitrification in soils. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00161.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.