Cited by 384Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transport

Global soil nitrous oxide emissions since the preindustrial era estimated by an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models: Magnitude, attribution, and uncertainty

Open access
Tian, Hanqin, Yang, Jia, Xu, Rongting, Lu, Chaoqun, Canadell, Josep G., Davidson, Eric A., Jackson, Robert B., Arneth, Almut +16 more·2019·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Our understanding and quantification of global soil nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions and the underlying processes remain largely uncertain. Here, we assessed the effects of multiple anthropogenic and natural factors, including nitrogen fertilizer (N) application, atmospheric N deposition, manure N application, land cover change, climate change, and rising atmospheric CO 2 concentration, on global soil N 2 O emissions for the period 1861–2016 using a standard simulation protocol with seven process‐based terrestrial biosphere models. Results suggest global soil N 2 O emissions have increased from 6.3 ± 1.1 Tg N 2 O‐N/year in the preindustrial period (the 1860s) to 10.0 ± 2.0 Tg N 2 O‐N/year in the recent decade (2007–2016). Cropland soil emissions increased from 0.3 Tg N 2 O‐N/year to 3.3 Tg N 2 O‐N/year over the same period, accounting for 82% of the total increase. Regionally, China, South Asia, and Southeast Asia underwent rapid increases in cropland N 2 O emissions since the 1970s. However, US cropland N 2 O emissions had been relatively flat in magnitude since the 1980s, and EU cropland N 2 O emissions appear to have decreased by 14%. Soil N 2 O emissions from predominantly natural ecosystems accounted for 67% of the global soil emissions in the recent decade but showed only a relatively small increase of 0.7 ± 0.5 Tg N 2 O‐N/year (11%) since the 1860s. In the recent decade, N fertilizer application, N deposition, manure N application, and climate change contributed 54%, 26%, 15%, and 24%, respectively, to the total increase. Rising atmospheric CO 2 concentration reduced soil N 2 O emissions by 10% through the enhanced plant N uptake, while land cover change played a minor role. Our estimation here does not account for indirect emissions from soils and the directed emissions from excreta of grazing livestock. To address uncertainties in estimating regional and global soil N 2 O emissions, this study recommends several critical strategies for improving the process‐based simulations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.14514

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • N2O emissions are generally associated with increased use of (mostly mineral) fertilizer, which on an expanding area of cropland has been estimated to have contributed >80% of the N2O emission increase since the 1860s.

    “N 2 O emissions are generally associated with increased use of (mostly mineral) fertilizer, which (on an expanding area of cropland) has been estimated to have contributed >80% of the N 2 O emission increase since the 1860s (43).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Results passage on cropland emissions (page unavailable) estimates that increased cropland soil N₂O emissions accounted for 82% of the global soil-emission increase from the 1860s to the recent decade. The ‘Contributions of factors responsible for the increased N₂O emissions’ section also identifies fertilizer addition as a contributor. But the 82% figure is for cropland emissions, not the share caused by mostly mineral fertilizer on expanding cropland; the paper assesses manure, deposition, climate and other factors separately. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Alexander V, Billington M (1986) Nitrogen fixation in the Alaskan taiga. In: Forest ecosystems in the Alaskan taiga. pp 112-120, Springer.
  2. Ambus P (1998) Nitrous oxide production by denitrification and nitrification in temperate forest, grassland and agricultural soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 49, 495- 502.
  3. Arnold JG, Moriasi DN, Gassman PW et al. (2012) SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE, 55, 1491-1508.
  4. Beier C, Beierkuhnlein C, Wohlgemuth T et al. (2012) Precipitation manipulation experiments-challenges and recommendations for the future. Ecology letters, 15, 899- 911.
  5. Bouwman A, Boumans L, Batjes N (2002) Emissions of N 2 O and NO from fertilized fields: Summary of available measurement data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16(4), 1058, doi:10.1029/2001GB001811 · DOI
  6. Butterbach-Bahl K, Baggs EM, Dannenmann M, Kiese R, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S (2013) Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B, 368, 20130122, DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0122 · DOI
  7. Calle L, Canadell JG, Patra P et al. (2016) Regional carbon fluxes from land use and land cover change in Asia, 1980-2009. Environmental Research Letters, 11, 074011, DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074011 · DOI
  8. Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)] (pp.465-570). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Dalal RC, Wang W, Robertson GP, Parton WJ (2003) Nitrous oxide emission from Australian agricultural lands and mitigation options: a review. Soil Research, 41, 165- 195.
  10. Davidson EA, Kanter D (2014) Inventories and scenarios of nitrous oxide emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 9, 105012.
  11. Hao W, Scharffe D, Crutzen P, Sanhueza E (1988) Production of N 2 O, CH 4 , and CO 2 from soils in the tropical savanna during the dry season. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 7, 93-105.
  12. Hedin LO, Brookshire EJ, Menge DN, Barron AR (2009) The nitrogen paradox in tropical forest ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 613- 635.
  13. Ishizuka S, Tsuruta H, Murdiyarso D (2002) An intensive field study on CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O emissions from soils at four land-use types in Sumatra, Indonesia. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16(3), 1049, DOI:10.1029/2001GB001614 · DOI
  14. Kanter DR, Zhang X, Mauzerall DL, Malyshev S, Shevliakova E (2016) The importance of climate change and nitrogen use efficiency for future nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture. Environmental Research Letters, 11, 094003.
  15. Levine JS, Cofer WR, Sebacher DI et al. (1990) The effects of fire on biogenic emissions of methane and nitric oxide from wetlands. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 95, 1853-1864.
  16. Li C, Aber J, Stange F, Butterbach-Bahl K, Papen H (2000) A process-oriented model of N 2 O and NO emissions from forest soils: 1. Model development. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 105, 4369-4384.
  17. Li C, Frolking S, Frolking TA (1992) A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events: 1. Model structure and sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 97, 9759-9776.
  18. Liu L, Greaver TL (2009) A review of nitrogen enrichment effects on three biogenic GHGs: the CO 2 sink may be largely offset by stimulated N 2 O and CH 4 emission. Ecology Letters, 12, 1103-1117.
  19. Liu M, Tian H (2010) China's land cover and land use change from 1700 to 2005: Estimations from high-resolution satellite data and historical archives. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 24, GB3003, DOI:10.1029/2009GB003687 · DOI
  20. Macfarling Meure C, Etheridge D, Trudinger C et al. (2006) Law Dome CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O ice core records extended to 2000 years BP. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L14810, doi:10.1029/2006GL026152 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Melillo J, Steudler P, Feigl B et al. (2001) Nitrous oxide emissions from forests and pastures of various ages in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106, 34179-34188.
  22. Pärn J, Verhoeven JT, Butterbach-Bahl K et al. (2018) Nitrogen-rich organic soils under warm well-drained conditions are global nitrous oxide emission hotspots. Nature communications, 9, 1135, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03540-1. · DOI
  23. Parton W, Holland E, Del Grosso S et al. (2001) Generalized model for NOx and N 2 O emissions from soils. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106, 17403- 17419.
  24. Potter CS, Matson PA, Vitousek PM, Davidson EA (1996) Process modeling of controls on nitrogen trace gas emissions from soils worldwide. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 101, 1361-1377.
  25. Prather MJ, Hsu J, Deluca NM et al. (2015) Measuring and modeling the lifetime of nitrous oxide including its variability. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120, 5693-5705.
  26. Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004) Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 11001-11006.
  27. Schindlbacher A, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Butterbach-Bahl K (2004) Effects of soil moisture and temperature on NO, NO 2 , and N 2 O emissions from European forest soils. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109, D17302, DOI:10.1029/2004JD004590, Shcherbak I, Millar N, Robertson GP (2014) Global metaanalysis of the nonlinear response of soil nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions to fertilizer nitrogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 9199-9204. · DOI
  28. Smith KA, Mosier AR, Crutzen PJ, Winiwarter W (2012) The role of N 2 O derived from crop- based biofuels, and from agriculture in general, in Earth's climate. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 367, 1169-1174.
  29. Tian H, Yang J, Lu C et al. (2018) The global N 2 O Model Intercomparison Project, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, DOI:10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0212. · DOI
  30. Vanderbilt K, Gaiser E (2017) The international long term ecological research network: a platform for collaboration. Ecosphere, 8, e01697, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1697 · DOI
  31. Vitousek PM, Menge DN, Reed SC, Cleveland CC (2013) Biological nitrogen fixation: rates, patterns and ecological controls in terrestrial ecosystems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368, 20130119. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0119 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Walbridge MR, Shafer SR (2011) A long-term agro-ecosystem research (LTAR) network for agriculture. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Interagency Conference in the Watersheds: Observing, Studying, and Managing Change.
  33. Weier K, Doran J, Power J, Walters D (1993) Denitrification and the dinitrogen/nitrous oxide ratio as affected by soil water, available carbon, and nitrate. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57, 66-72.
  34. Werner C, Butterbach-Bahl K, Haas E, Hickler T, Kiese R (2007) A global inventory of N 2 O emissions from tropical rainforest soils using a detailed biogeochemical model. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 21, GB3010. doi:10.1029/2006GB002909 · DOI
  35. Wieder WR, Cleveland CC, Lawrence DM, Bonan GB (2015) Effects of model structural uncertainty on carbon cycle projections: biological nitrogen fixation as a case study. Environmental Research Letters, 10, 044016, DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/044016 · DOI
  36. Zaehle S (2013) Terrestrial nitrogen-carbon cycle interactions at the global scale. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B, 368, 20130125, DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0125 · DOI
  37. Zhang J, Tian H, Yang J, Pan S (2018) Improving Representation of Crop Growth and Yield in the Dynamic Land Ecosystem Model and its Application to China. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 10, 1680-1707.
  38. Zou J, Huang Y, Jiang J, Zheng X, Sass RL (2005) A 3-year field measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in China: Effects of water regime, crop residue, and fertilizer application. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19, GB2021, DOI:10.1029/2004GB002401. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tian, H., Yang, J., Xu, R., Lu, C., Canadell, J. G., Davidson, E. A., Jackson, R. B., Arneth, A., Chang, J., Ciais, P., Gerber, S., Ito, A., Joos, F., Lienert, S., Messina, P., Olin, S., Pan, S., Peng, C., Saikawa, E., Thompson, R. L., Vuichard, N., Winiwarter, W., Zaehle, S., & Zhang, B.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Auburn University (US)
  • Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology Iowa State University Ames Iowa
  • CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU)
  • University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Department of Environmental Sciences Emory University Atlanta Georgia
  • NILU (NO)
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE)
Corresponding author
Tian, Hanqin
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-17
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
640-659
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2899892480
Cited by
384
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 21 · 2016: 2
FWCI
25.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1210360, 1243232)
  • Lunds Universitet
  • Austrian Science Fund (P29130‐G27)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17H01867)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (200020_172476)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil nitrous oxide emissions, cropland emissions, nitrogen fertilization, atmospheric nitrogen deposition, land cover change, atmospheric CO2 increase, plant nitrogen uptake, terrestrial biosphere models, emission attribution, greenhouse gas emissions
MeSH terms
Industrial Development, Greenhouse Gases, Air Pollutants, Models, Theoretical, Nitrous Oxide, Soil, Time Factors, Uncertainty, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review