The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maximum impacts of future reforestation or deforestation on atmospheric CO2
Open accessAbstract
There is scope for land‐use changes to increase or decrease CO 2 concentrations in the atmosphere over the next century. Here we make simple but robust calculations of the maximum impact of such changes. Historical land‐use changes (mostly deforestation) and fossil fuel emissions have caused an increase in atmospheric concentration of CO 2 of 90 ppm between the pre‐industrial era and year 2000. The projected range of CO 2 concentrations in 2100, under a range of emissions scenarios developed for the IPCC, is 170–600 ppm above 2000 levels. This range is mostly due to different assumptions regarding fossil fuel emissions. If all of the carbon so far released by land‐use changes could be restored to the terrestrial biosphere, atmospheric CO 2 concentration at the end of the century would be about 40–70 ppm less than it would be if no such intervention had occurred. Conversely, complete global deforestation over the same time frame would increase atmospheric concentrations by about 130–290 ppm. These are extreme assumptions; the maximum feasible reforestation and afforestation activities over the next 50 years would result in a reduction in CO 2 concentration of about 15–30 ppm by the end of the century. Thus the time course of fossil fuel emissions will be the major factor in determining atmospheric CO 2 concentrations for the foreseeable future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems
Schimel, D. S., House, J. I., Hibbard, K. A., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Peylin, P., Braswell, B. H., Apps, M. J., Baker, D., Bondeau, A., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35102500 · Cited by 1,379
Self-citationThe annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990*
Houghton, R. A. (1999) · Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology · doi:10.3402/tellusb.v51i2.16288 · Cited by 852
Cited by
Griscom, B. W., Adams, J., Ellis, P. W., Houghton, R. A., Lomax, G., Miteva, D. A., Schlesinger, W. H., Shoch, D., Siikamäki, J. V., Smith, P., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1710465114 · Cited by 3,481
Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry models
Quéré, C. L., Harrison, S. P., Colin Prentice, I., Buitenhuis, E. T., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Claustre, H., Cotrim Da Cunha, L., Geider, R., Giraud, X., et al. (2005) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.1004.x · Cited by 849
Self-citationBioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment
Creutzig, F., Ravindranath, N. H., Berndes, G., Bolwig, S., Bright, R., Cherubini, F., Chum, H., Corbera, E., Delucchi, M., Faaij, A., et al. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12205 · Cited by 752
Sterman, J. D., & Sweeney, L. B. (2007) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9107-5 · Cited by 431
Global pattern of soil carbon losses due to the conversion of forests to agricultural land
Wei, X., Shao, M., Gale, W., & Li, L. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04062 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- HOUSE, J. I., COLIN PRENTICE, I., & LE QUÉRÉ, C.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09-30
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1047-1052
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2060567473
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximum impacts of future reforestation or deforestation on atmospheric CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00536.x
- The paper
- HOUSE, J. I., COLIN PRENTICE, I., & LE QUÉRÉ, C. (2002). Maximum impacts of future reforestation or deforestation on atmospheric CO2. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00536.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.