Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,062

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well‐treated teeth can fail

Open access
Siqueira, J. F.·2001·International Endodontic Journal

Abstract

Literature review: Root canal treatment usually fails when the treatment is carried out inadequately. However, there are some cases in which the treatment has followed the highest standards yet still results in failure. In most of the cases, the endodontic failure results from persistent or secondary intraradicular infection. Extraradicular infections may also be implicated in the failure of some cases. In addition, it has been claimed that a few cases can fail because of intrinsic or extrinsic nonmicrobial factors. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the aetiology of the failure of root canal treatment, particularly in cases of well‐treated root canals. Indications for the treatment of endodontic failures are also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00396.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,062

Metadata

Authors
Siqueira, J. F.
Venue
International Endodontic Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0143-2885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2591
OpenAlex
W2120275268
Cited by
1,062
References
0
FWCI
17.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well‐treated teeth can fail. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00396.x
The paper
Siqueira, J. F. (2001). Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well‐treated teeth can fail. International Endodontic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00396.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.