Cited by 265Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesNursing Roles and Practices

Expert: a discussion of the implications of the concept as used in nursing

Jasper, Melanie A·1994·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

The concept 'expert' has become common in the nursing literature since Benner's (1984) work more than a decade ago. Whilst the term has a common meaning, it is apparent that when used in nursing it refers to a multitude of attributes and lacks clear definition. This paper uses the strategy for concept analysis developed by Walker & Avant (1988) to seek an operational definition for the concept of 'expert', and suggests the defining attributes of: possession of a specialized body of knowledge and skill; extensive experience in a field of practice; highly developed levels of pattern recognition, and acknowledgement by others. These are discussed in relation to nursing practice and the circumstances under which the concept is used. Development of cases is carried out to exemplify the concept, and the antecedents and consequences of the attributes are discussed, suggesting that the concept lacks clarity, both in conceptualization, and in use. A first definition of the concept is posed to open debate concerning the relevance of the term for the future. The conclusions reached suggest that whilst an operational definition is unlikely to be found, because of the problems of definition and measurement, it is possible, through various strategies, to recognize expert practice and use it to further develop nursing. Furthermore, it is likely to become increasingly important to recognize and reward expert practitioners, given the political and economic constraints in health care today.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20040769.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An expert nurse displays advanced levels of skill and knowledge gained through experience, with the ability not only to apply but also to move beyond theoretical principles.

    “An expert nurse is a person who displays advanced levels of skill and knowledge (Jasper 1994) gained through experience (Benner 1984) with the ability not only to apply but also to move beyond theoretical principles.”
  • Many nurses see the pinnacle of achievement as the attainment of expertise.

    “and many nurses see the pinnacle of achievement as the attainment of expertise (Jasper 1994).”

Authors
Jasper, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Jasper, Melanie A
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-10
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
769-776
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W1993618507
Cited by
265
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
Keywords
expert practice, conceptual analysis, nursing expertise, operational definitions, pattern recognition, expert practitioners, nursing practice development
MeSH terms
Concept Formation, Educational Status, Expert Systems, Humans, Judgment, Terminology as Topic, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Peer Group, Professional Competence, Nursing Evaluation Research, Models, Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review