Expert: a discussion of the implications of the concept as used in nursing
Abstract
The concept 'expert' has become common in the nursing literature since Benner's (1984) work more than a decade ago. Whilst the term has a common meaning, it is apparent that when used in nursing it refers to a multitude of attributes and lacks clear definition. This paper uses the strategy for concept analysis developed by Walker & Avant (1988) to seek an operational definition for the concept of 'expert', and suggests the defining attributes of: possession of a specialized body of knowledge and skill; extensive experience in a field of practice; highly developed levels of pattern recognition, and acknowledgement by others. These are discussed in relation to nursing practice and the circumstances under which the concept is used. Development of cases is carried out to exemplify the concept, and the antecedents and consequences of the attributes are discussed, suggesting that the concept lacks clarity, both in conceptualization, and in use. A first definition of the concept is posed to open debate concerning the relevance of the term for the future. The conclusions reached suggest that whilst an operational definition is unlikely to be found, because of the problems of definition and measurement, it is possible, through various strategies, to recognize expert practice and use it to further develop nursing. Furthermore, it is likely to become increasingly important to recognize and reward expert practitioners, given the political and economic constraints in health care today.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An expert nurse displays advanced levels of skill and knowledge gained through experience, with the ability not only to apply but also to move beyond theoretical principles.
“An expert nurse is a person who displays advanced levels of skill and knowledge (Jasper 1994) gained through experience (Benner 1984) with the ability not only to apply but also to move beyond theoretical principles.”
From The acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise: a grounded theory study (2006) · cites this paper as Jasper 1994
Many nurses see the pinnacle of achievement as the attainment of expertise.
“and many nurses see the pinnacle of achievement as the attainment of expertise (Jasper 1994).”
From The acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise: a grounded theory study (2006) · cites this paper as Jasper 1994
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recognition of expertise: An important concept in the acquisition of nephrology nursing expertise
Bonner, A. (2003) · Nursing & Health Sciences · doi:10.1046/j.1442-2018.2003.00143.x · Cited by 44 · see citing works
The acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise: a grounded theory study
Bonner, A., & Greenwood, J. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01361.x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jasper, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jasper, Melanie A
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 769-776
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W1993618507
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
- Keywords
- expert practice, conceptual analysis, nursing expertise, operational definitions, pattern recognition, expert practitioners, nursing practice development
- MeSH terms
- Concept Formation, Educational Status, Expert Systems, Humans, Judgment, Terminology as Topic, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Peer Group, Professional Competence, Nursing Evaluation Research, Models, Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review