The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using research for practice: a UK experience of the BARRIERS Scale
Abstract
It is generally recognized that the majority of health care has been largely based upon opinion rather than research evidence of clinical effectiveness. Attempts to rectify this have been initiated by increasing emphasis on the dissemination of findings. For example, in the UK this had been supported via the Cochran Collaboration and the Centre for Dissemination and Reviews. Dissemination does not, however, guarantee implementation. The complex nature of research utilization has been studied and obstacles identified that can influence the uptake of research by practising nurses. Sandra Funk and colleagues developed the BARRIERS Scale using this research and literature on research utilization. The scale may be helpful for identifying and measuring the barriers to research utilization perceived by nurses working within the UK and has formed the basis of the present study. A convenience sample of 316 comprising a broad spectrum of nurses working in the UK provided the data. Comparison is made with North American nurses from the studies used in the scale's development. The results suggest there ware items which are consistently perceived as either strong or negligible barriers by both groups of nurses. Differences, however, did emerge between nurses from the UK and North America on several items. These included the confidence in evaluating research and the perception of the nurse's authority to change patient procedures. Psychometric evaluation was also done. These findings are presented and discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Use of Research to Improve Professional Practice: a systematic review of the literature
HEMSLEY-BROWN, J., & SHARP, C. (2003) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/0305498032000153025 · Cited by 360
Barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization among nurses in Northern Ireland
Parahoo, K. (2000) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01256.x · Cited by 329
Overcoming Barriers and Promoting the Use of Research in Practice
Fink, R., Thompson, C. J., & Bonnes, D. (2005) · JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration · doi:10.1097/00005110-200503000-00005 · Cited by 326
Hutchinson, A. M., & Johnston, L. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00865.x · Cited by 307
A Conceptual Model for Growing Evidence-based Practice
Vratny, A., & Shriver, D. (2007) · Nursing Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1097/01.naq.0000264866.79711.08 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunn, V., Crichton, N., Roe, B., Seers, K., & Williams, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1203-1210
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2031362018
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using research for practice: a UK experience of the BARRIERS Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00462.x
- The paper
- Dunn, V., Crichton, N., Roe, B., Seers, K., & Williams, K. (1997). Using research for practice: a UK experience of the BARRIERS Scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00462.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.