The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self‐efficacy as a predictor of academic performance in science
Abstract
Nursing students have traditionally experienced difficulties with the science subjects in nursing curricula, and irrespective of the institution conducting a nursing programme, this trend appears to be continuing. A satisfactory means of predicting academic performance in these subjects will facilitate the development of educational strategies designed to assist students overcome their difficulties. In this study, an instrument called the Self‐Efficacy for Science (SEFS) was developed and tested. The SEFS was designed to predict academic performance in the science areas of a first‐year undergraduate nursing course. A cohort of first‐year students enrolled in a bachelor of nursing course were surveyed by questionnaire. Students’ academic scores for two first‐year science subjects were obtained and used as the criterion measure for the study. Principal component factor analysis revealed the SEFS contained six instead of the hypothesized four factors. These six factors could explain 70% of students’ self‐efficacy for science. Cronbach alpha of the SEFS was 0·9. The SEFS could predict 24% of the cohort’s academic performance in a physical science subject and 18·5% for a bioscience subject. Studying science in the final year at high school was not statistically significantly related to the SEFS. Implications for students and future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1986) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.33.3.265 · Cited by 861
Cited by
Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20131 · Cited by 1,155
Lishinski, A., Yadav, A., Good, J., & Enbody, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/2960310.2960329 · Cited by 199
Computing Education Research Today
Fincher, S. A., Tenenberg, J., Dorn, B., Hundhausen, C., McCartney, R., & Murphy, L. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.003 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrew, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 596-603
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2120123670
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self‐efficacy as a predictor of academic performance in science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00550.x
- The paper
- Andrew, S. (1998). Self‐efficacy as a predictor of academic performance in science. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00550.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.