Cited by 209Health Education and ValidationPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMenstrual Health and Disorders

Translation of questionnaires and issues of equivalence

Chang, Anne M., Chau, Janita P.C., Holroyd, Eleanor·1999·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Translation of questionnaires and issues of equivalence¶ The validity of studies using translated instruments may be questioned when there is a lack of attention to and/or minimal explanation of the procedures used for determining the equivalence between the primary and secondary language tool. Ensuring equivalence of a translated Chinese version of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire is an important prerequisite for identifying culturally specific expressions of concepts under investigation and for cross‐cultural comparisons. This paper examines the principles and procedures for determining equivalence of translated tools and their application to the development of an equivalent Chinese version of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire. Translation and back‐translation were used to develop a Chinese version of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire. Bilingual university students completed both versions of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire. Most of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire items had an acceptable Kappa openface> 0·4. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated moderate to high levels of equivalence for total scores and all scales. Improvement in the translation of some items is needed to further enhance the equivalence of the Chinese version of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00891.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, A. M., Chau, J. P. C., & Holroyd, E.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-02
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
316-322
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2059004711
Cited by
209
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
14.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
Menstrual Distress Questionnaire, questionnaire translation, cross-cultural equivalence, Chinese translation, back-translation, menstrual distress, psychometric validation, kappa agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Premenstrual Syndrome, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Cross-Over Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review