The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methodological issues in grounded theory
Open accessAbstract
Examination of the qualitative methodological literature shows that there appear to be conflicting opinions and unresolved issues regarding the nature and process of grounded theory. Researchers proposing to utilize this method would therefore be wise to consider these conflicting opinions. This paper therefore identifies and attempts to address four key issues, namely, sampling, creativity and reflexivity, the use of literature, and precision within grounded theory. The following recommendations are made. When utilizing a grounded method researchers need to consider their research question, clarify what level of theory is likely to be induced from their study, and then decide when they intend to access and introduce the second body of literature. They should acknowledge that in the early stages of data collection, some purposeful sampling appears to occur. In their search for conceptually dense theory, grounded theory researchers may wish to free themselves from the constraints that limit their use of creativity and tacit knowledge. Furthermore, the interests of researchers might be served by attention to issues of precision including, avoiding method slurring, ensuring theoretical coding occurs, and using predominantly one method of grounded theory while explaining and describing any deviation away from this chosen method. Such mindfulness and the resulting methodological rigour is likely to increase the overall quality of the inquiry and enhance the credibility of the findings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This bottom-up approach to theory development aims to minimize the influence of prior knowledge and researchers’ subjective biases (36).”
From Caring alone: older adult care burdens, practices, and structural imbalances among China's one-child generation (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Therefore, we conclude that all nodes in this study are sufficiently dense, and the relationships among nodes are adequately described, reaching theoretical saturation (36).”
From Caring alone: older adult care burdens, practices, and structural imbalances among China's one-child generation (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“It is a theory generated from the data, rather than a theory formulated prior to the data (36).”
From Caring alone: older adult care burdens, practices, and structural imbalances among China's one-child generation (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,525
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · Cited by 45,787
(1990) · Cited by 24,217
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,077
(1992) · Cited by 2,855
(1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,472
Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling: Merging or clear boundaries?
Coyne, I. T. (1997) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x · Cited by 2,402
(1994) · Cited by 1,079
Grounded Theory Methodology: Its Uses and Processes
Stern, P. N. (1980) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1980.tb01455.x · Cited by 709
Method slurring: the grounded theory/phenomenology example
Baker, C., Wuest, J., & Stern, P. N. (1992) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01859.x · Cited by 701
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- HammersleyM.(1992)What’s Wrong with Ethnography?Routledge London.
- HutchinsonS.A.(1993)Grounded theory: the method. InNursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective2nd edn (Munhall P.L. & Boyd C.A. eds) National League for Nursing Press New York pp. 180–212.
- MorseJ.M.(1994)Emerging from the data: the cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative enquiry. InCritical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods(Morse J.M. ed.) Sage London pp. 23–43.
- SandelowskiM. Holditch‐DavisD. HarrisB.G.(1992)Using qualitative and quantitative methods: the transition to parenthood of infertile couples. InQualitative Methods in Family Research(Gilgum J.F. Daly K. Handel G. eds) Sage London pp. 301–323.
- SternP.N.(1994)Eroding grounded theory. InCritical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods(Morse J.M. ed.) Sage London pp. 210–223.
- Stern P.N., 1982, The nurse as a grounded theorist: history, process and uses, Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Science, 7, 200
- StraussA.&CorbinJ.(1994)Grounded theory methodology: an overview. InHandbook of Qualitative Research(Denzin N.K. & Lincoln Y.S. eds) Sage London pp. 273–285.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory
Starks, H., & Brown Trinidad, S. (2007) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732307307031 · Cited by 2,528
“…of establishing an audit trail, whereby the analyst documents her thoughts and reactions as a way of keeping track of emerging impressions of what the data mean, how they relate to each other, and how engaging with the data shapes her understanding of the initial hypotheses (Cutcliffe, 2000).”
BackgroundQualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience
Brod, M. I., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9 · Cited by 1,080
Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss
Heath, H., & Cowley, S. (2004) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00113-5 · Cited by 837
“Cutcliffe (2000) suggested that decisions about the literature depend on two factors.”
BackgroundParadigms, praxis, problems, and promise: Grounded theory in counseling psychology research.
Fassinger, R. E. (2005) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.156 · Cited by 723
Power Relations in Qualitative Research
Karnieli‐Miller, O., Strier, R., & Pessach, L. (2008) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732308329306 · Cited by 643
“The reengagement is implemented through follow-up interviews meant to check the authenticity of emerging insights identified by researchers and verification of participants’ intended meanings (Cutcliffe, 2000) or member checking, carried out individually or in a group, in which participants have the opportunity to dis…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Cutcliffe, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cutcliffe, John R.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1476-1484
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2165793557
- Cited by
- 642
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- works.bepress.com
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CORE Scholar (Wright State University) (submittedVersion)
- Journal of Bioresource Management (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
- Keywords
- grounded theory, qualitative research methodology, sampling, creativity, reflexivity, tacit knowledge, methodological quality, nursing research
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Nursing, Nursing Theory, Nursing Methodology Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
