The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors affecting first-year survival in grey seals and their implications for life history strategy
Abstract
Abstract In order to estimate the effect of weaning mass and body condition on the post‐weaning survival of grey seal pups from the Isle of May, Scotland in 1998 during their first year of life, a simultaneous analysis of live resighting and dead recovery mark–recapture data was used. A new type of tag was employed which allowed individuals to be identified when resighted alive ( Hall, Moss & McConnell 2000 ) as well as when found dead. The probability of post‐weaning survival to age 1 increased with body condition at weaning and differed between the sexes. Regardless of pup condition and time of year, the odds of survival for female pups over a 2‐month interval was estimated to be 3·37 (SE = 1·30) times higher than for males. Regardless of sex, a 1 standard deviation increase in pup condition was estimated to increase the odds of survival by a factor of 1·422 (SE = 0·226). For a male pup in average condition (0·41 kg cm−1) the estimated annual survival after adjusting for tag‐loss was 0·193 (SE = 0·084); for a female pup in average condition (0·39 kg cm−1) it was 0·617 (SE = 0·155). The effect of condition at weaning on survival was significantly greater for male pups than for females. This implies that high quality females should invest more heavily in their male pups because the marginal return, in terms of increased reproductive value, from any additional expenditure is twice that for females. Male pups in our sample were significantly heavier at weaning and in better condition than female pups. However, this does not provide conclusive support for our predictions, because we could not control for the effects of maternal size on weaned mass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals
White, G. C., & Burnham, K. P. (1999) · Bird Study · doi:10.1080/00063659909477239 · Cited by 7,499
Lebreton, J.-D., Burnham, K. P., Clobert, J., & Anderson, D. R. (1992) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937171 · Cited by 4,517
Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach
Strawderman, R. L., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2669574 · Cited by 4,194
Natural Selection of Parental Ability to Vary the Sex Ratio of Offspring
Trivers, R. L., & Willard, D. E. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.179.4068.90 · Cited by 3,832
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2917-7 · Cited by 3,387
The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters.
Cormack, R. M., & Seber, G. A. F. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531423 · Cited by 3,289
Model Selection: An Integral Part of Inference
Buckland, S. T., Burnham, K. P., & Augustin, N. H. (1997) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533961 · Cited by 1,717
Statistical inference from band recovery data - a handbook
Brownie, C., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., & Robson, D. S. (1985) · Resource Publication · Cited by 726
Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D., & Guinness, F. E. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/308358a0 · Cited by 533
Recent studies of avian sex ratios
Sheldon, B. C. (1998) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6883740 · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Ailsa J., H., Bernie J., M., & Richard J., B.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 138-149
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W1578918315
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors affecting first-year survival in grey seals and their implications for life history strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00468.x
- The paper
- Ailsa J., H., Bernie J., M., & Richard J., B. (2001). Factors affecting first-year survival in grey seals and their implications for life history strategy. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00468.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.