Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors affecting first-year survival in grey seals and their implications for life history strategy

Ailsa J., Hall, Bernie J., McConnell, Richard J., Barker·2001·Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

Abstract In order to estimate the effect of weaning mass and body condition on the post‐weaning survival of grey seal pups from the Isle of May, Scotland in 1998 during their first year of life, a simultaneous analysis of live resighting and dead recovery mark–recapture data was used. A new type of tag was employed which allowed individuals to be identified when resighted alive ( Hall, Moss & McConnell 2000 ) as well as when found dead. The probability of post‐weaning survival to age 1 increased with body condition at weaning and differed between the sexes. Regardless of pup condition and time of year, the odds of survival for female pups over a 2‐month interval was estimated to be 3·37 (SE = 1·30) times higher than for males. Regardless of sex, a 1 standard deviation increase in pup condition was estimated to increase the odds of survival by a factor of 1·422 (SE = 0·226). For a male pup in average condition (0·41 kg cm−1) the estimated annual survival after adjusting for tag‐loss was 0·193 (SE = 0·084); for a female pup in average condition (0·39 kg cm−1) it was 0·617 (SE = 0·155). The effect of condition at weaning on survival was significantly greater for male pups than for females. This implies that high quality females should invest more heavily in their male pups because the marginal return, in terms of increased reproductive value, from any additional expenditure is twice that for females. Male pups in our sample were significantly heavier at weaning and in better condition than female pups. However, this does not provide conclusive support for our predictions, because we could not control for the effects of maternal size on weaned mass.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00468.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Metadata

Authors
Ailsa J., H., Bernie J., M., & Richard J., B.
Venue
Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-01
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
138-149
ISSN
  • 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2656
OpenAlex
W1578918315
Cited by
268
References
33
FWCI
12.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors affecting first-year survival in grey seals and their implications for life history strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00468.x
The paper
Ailsa J., H., Bernie J., M., & Richard J., B. (2001). Factors affecting first-year survival in grey seals and their implications for life history strategy. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00468.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.