The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interactive effects of concealment, parental behaviour and predators on the survival of open passerine nests
Abstract
1 A simple model of relative effects of parental behaviour (parents present vs. absent) and nest concealment on probability of nest predation was evaluated by measuring survival of paired natural/artificial nests of four open nesting passerines over 3 years. 2 The ratio of rodent to corvid predation (i) decreased from yellowhammer (small eggs, ground/near ground nests) through blackcap (small, shrub) to song thrush and blackbird (medium sized, shrub/subcanopy); (ii) was highest in years when rodent abundance peaked – this effect was clear in yellowhammer, detectable in blackcap, but not found in thrushes. An inverse relationship was found between mean annual nest survival and abundance of the major nest predator for each species. Predators differed between poorly (corvids) and well-concealed (rodents) nests in blackcap. 3 The effects on nest survival differed among species, including: positive effect of parental behaviour combined with neutral effect of concealment (thrushes); independent positive effects of behaviour and concealment (yellowhammer); neutral effect of behaviour combined with positive effect of concealment (blackcap). These patterns are consistent with hypothesis that relatively larger species with conspicuous nests (thrushes) should either engage in more vigorous nest defence or their defence is more efficient, compared with smaller species with less conspicuous nests (blackcap). 4 The positive relationship between nest concealment and survival resulted either from an effect of nest site per se (yellowhammer) or from an effect of parental behaviour (blackcap) that changed from negative (nest disclosure) to positive (nest defence) between poorly and well-concealed nests, respectively. The view that lack of a within-species relationship between nest concealment and survival (thrushes) results from parental behaviour compensating for predation risk associated with poor nest concealment was not supported. 5 This study demonstrated (i) multiple interactions among factors influencing the rate of nest predation, both between and within species; (ii) potential bias associated with drawing general conclusions from small-scale experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turner, B. D., & Crawley, M. J. (1994) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261403 · Cited by 2,074
Risks and Rewards of Nest Defence by Parent Birds
Montgomerie, R. D., & Weatherhead, P. J. (1988) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/415838 · Cited by 816
Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects
Martin, T. E., Scott, J., & Menge, C. (2000) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1281 · Cited by 681
ARE MICROHABITAT PREFERENCES OF COEXISTING SPECIES UNDER SELECTION AND ADAPTIVE?
Martin, T. E. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0656:ampocs]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 481
Parental Care and Clutch Sizes in North and South American Birds
Martin, T. E., Martin, P. R., Olson, C. R., Heidinger, B. J., & Fontaine, J. J. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5457.1482 · Cited by 449
MAJOR, R. E., & KENDAL, C. E. (1996) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1996.tb04342.x · Cited by 447
Interaction of Nest Predation and Food Limitation in Reproductive Strategies
Martin, T. E. (1992) · Current Ornithology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9921-7_5 · Cited by 340
Identifying predators and fates of grassland passerine nests using miniature video cameras
Pietz, P. J., & Granfors, D. A. (2000) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802976 · Cited by 337
Nest Site Selection: A Trade-Off between Concealment and View of the Surroundings?
Gotmark, F., Blomqvist, D., Johansson, O. C., & Bergkvist, J. (1995) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.2307/3677045 · Cited by 325
Evidence of Incidental Nest Predation and Its Effects on Nests of Threatened Grassland Birds
Vickery, P. D., Hunter, M. L., & Wells, J. V. (1992) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545389 · Cited by 318
Cited by
Egg size and offspring quality: a meta‐analysis in birds
Krist, M. (2011) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00166.x · Cited by 472
THE HUMAN FOOTPRINT IN THE WEST: A LARGE‐SCALE ANALYSIS OF ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACTS
Leu, M., Hanser, S. E., & Knick, S. T. (2008) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-0480.1 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Weidinger, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 424-437
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W2111837604
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactive effects of concealment, parental behaviour and predators on the survival of open passerine nests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00611.x
- The paper
- Weidinger, K. (2002). Interactive effects of concealment, parental behaviour and predators on the survival of open passerine nests. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00611.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.