The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of habitat fragmentation and road density on the distribution pattern of the moor frog Rana arvalis
Open accessAbstract
1. The effects of habitat fragmentation on the distribution pattern of the moor frog Rana arvalis were investigated. Also, the possible isolation effects of the road network were taken into account. 2. Indications were found that habitat fragmentation partly explains the distribution pattern of the moor frog. The statistical models showed a positive effect of pond size (or marsh area) and a negative effect of road density on the probability of occupation of a moorland pond. 3. Because of the strong correlation between habitat quality variables and isolation variables, no unambiguous effects of isolation, described as the amount of suitable terrestrial habitat (moorland) in the surroundings of a moorland pond in a radius of 100–2000 m, could be demonstrated. 4. Spatial differences in road density can play a role in the selection of optimal locations for nature protection areas. The regression model used in this study predicts a reduced occupation probability in 55% of the study area. In the part of the study area adjacent to a motorway, occupation probability is lowered to less than 30%. 5. European studies of habitat fragmentation on amphibian species revealed a mean distance between occupied ponds of <1 km in all studies. This could be a general rule of thumb for persistent amphibian populations. Effects of pond size on the probability of occupation were more variable. 6. When discussing the effects of habitat fragmentation on amphibians and other ground dwelling species, the negative effects of roads are often underestimated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities
Trombulak, S. C., & Frissell, C. A. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99084.x · Cited by 1,898
The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model
Adriaensen, F., Chardon, J. P., De Blust, G., Swinnen, E., Villalba, S., Gulinck, H., & Matthysen, E. (2003) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00242-6 · Cited by 1,342
Self-citationAgricultural drainage ditches, their biological importance and functioning
Herzon, I., & Helenius, J. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.005 · Cited by 391
Slater, F. M. (2002) · Web Ecology · doi:10.5194/we-3-33-2002 · Cited by 174
Connectivity measures: a review
Kindlmann, P., & Burel, F. (2008) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9245-4 · Cited by 124
Predicting Hot Spots of Herpetofauna Road Mortality Along Highway Networks
LANGEN, T. A., OGDEN, K. M., & SCHWARTING, L. L. (2009) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/2008-017 · Cited by 117
Foraging behaviour of little penguins Eudyptula minor in an artificially modified environment
Preston, T., Ropert-Coudert, Y., Kato, A., Chiaradia, A., Kirkwood, R., Dann, P., & Reina, R. (2008) · Endangered Species Research · doi:10.3354/esr00069 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Vos, C. C., & Chardon, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-56
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2070802246
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.