Cited by 391Ecology and biodiversity studiesLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

Agricultural drainage ditches, their biological importance and functioning

Herzon, Irina, Helenius, Juha·2008·Biological Conservation

Abstract

We reviewed studies on the biological state of agricultural drainage ditches in the temperate and boreal zones of the Northern Hemisphere. We looked at the relative importance of ditches for farmland biota as compared to that of other habitats, and assessed the degree to which biological communities of ditches contribute to the provisioning of ecosystem services. We evaluated impacts pertaining to replacement of open drains by subsurface drainage, removal of main ditches, rehabilitation of old drainage systems, and maintenance of ditches. Most ditches support species also common elsewhere. Whenever comprehensive surveys were conducted, ditches were shown to provide valuable wet vegetated non-cropped habitats to both aquatic and terrestrial taxa, supply food resources lacking in otherwise dry and intensively managed cropland, and perform connectivity functions within a wider landscape. Regionally ditches were shown to harbour rare species or species not found presently in other farmland habitats. Some functions of drainage ditches, such as regulating water flow and nutrient retention, are likely to depend on the composition and structure of biological communities of ditches, though the issue remains poorly explored. The biggest threat to the quality of ditch networks as ecosystems is presented by a severe runoff from the fields, management in disregard of a habitat value of ditches, and removal of ditches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.005

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potential for ditches to be adaptively managed for greater diversity of ecosystem services exists.

    “Many of these future considerations presented will be opportunities, for ditches are rife with these; the potential for ditches to be adaptively managed for greater diversity of ecosystem services 13,18,21 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

  • Despite their fundamental importance to society and potential to supplement ecosystem services, ditches remain understudied and undervalued.

    “Unfortunately, despite their fundamental importance to society and potential to supplement ecosystem services, ditches remain understudied and undervalued 21,22 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

  • Ditches are frequently overlooked by researchers in many disciplines.

    “However, ditches are frequently overlooked by researchers in many disciplines.”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

  • The diverse ecosystem services from ditches often conflict when they sometimes could synergize to deliver multifunctionality.

    “Yet the diverse ecosystem services from ditches often conflict when they sometimes could synergize to deliver multifunctionality (i.e., multiple ecosystem services simultaneously) 20,21 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

  • Many ditches represent novel ecosystems with distinct biotic communities.

    “Despite this, many ditches represent novel ecosystems with distinct biotic communities 21,[184][185][186] , and can support a high biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates 106,187 ), waterbirds 188,189 , amphibians 190 , macrophytes 191,192 and fish 193,194 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herzon, I., & Helenius, J.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Herzon, Irina
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
141
Issue
5
Pages
1171-1183
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059574774
Cited by
391
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
Funders
Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Keywords
agricultural drainage ditches, ecosystem services, wetland habitat, species connectivity, rare species, subsurface drainage, nutrient retention, water flow control, agricultural runoff

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review