The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Weak-acid preservatives: modelling microbial inhibition and response
Abstract
Weak-acid preservatives are widely used to prevent microbial spoilage of acidic foods and beverages. Characteristically, weak-acid preservatives do not kill micro-organisms but inhibit growth, causing very extended lag phases. Preservatives are more effective at low pH values where solutions contain increased concentrations of undissociated acids. Inhibition by weak-acids involves rapid diffusion of undissociated molecules through the plasma membrane; dissociation of these molecules within cells liberates protons, thus acidifying the cytoplasm and preventing growth. By modelling preservative action in yeast, using a thermodynamic and kinetic approach, it was possible to demonstrate that: (i) inhibition depends more on the degree to which individual preservatives are concentrated within cells, rather than on undissociated acid concentration per se; (ii) it is entirely feasible for microbes to pump protons out of the cell during extended lag phase and raise internal pH (pHi), despite further influx of preservatives; (iii) the duration of the lag phase can be predicted from the model, using a Gaussian fit of proton-pumping H(+)-ATPase activity against pHi; (iv) theoretical ATP consumption for proton pumping can be directly correlated with the reduction in cell yield observed in glucose-limited cultures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wainaina, S., Lukitawesa, Kumar Awasthi, M., & Taherzadeh, M. J. (2019) · Bioengineered · doi:10.1080/21655979.2019.1673937 · Cited by 555
RetractedThe utilization and mode of action of organic acids in the feeds of cultured aquatic animals
Ng, W., & Koh, C. (2017) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12141 · Cited by 331
The effects of various antifungal additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage
Kleinschmit, D. H., Schmidt, R. J., & Kung, L. (2005) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72889-7 · Cited by 233
Effects of metabolites derived from gut microbiota and hosts on pathogens
Li, Z., Quan, G., Jiang, X., Yang, Y., Ding, X., Zhang, D., Wang, X., Hardwidge, P. R., Ren, W., & Zhu, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2018.00314 · Cited by 157
Schmidt, R. J., & Kung, L. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2555 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambert, R. J., & Stratford, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 157-164
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W1996184189
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weak-acid preservatives: modelling microbial inhibition and response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00646.x
- The paper
- Lambert, R. J., & Stratford, M. (1999). Weak-acid preservatives: modelling microbial inhibition and response. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00646.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.