Cited by 233Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

The effects of various antifungal additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage

Open access
Kleinschmit, D.H., Schmidt, R.J., Kung, L.·2005·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

In 2 consecutive years, whole plant corn was ensiled in laboratory silos to investigate the effects of various silage additives on fermentation, dry matter (DM) recovery and aerobic stability. In yr 1, chopped forage was treated with 1) no additive (untreated, U), 2) Lactobacillus buchneri 40788, 4×10 5 cfu/g of fresh forage (LLB4), 3) L. buchneri 11A44, 1×10 5 cfu/g (PLB), 4) Biomax 5 ( Lactobacillus plantarum PA-28 and K-270), 1×10 5 cfu/g (B5), 5) Silo Guard II (sodium metabisulfite and amylase), 0.05% of fresh forage weight (SG), 6) a buffered propionic acid-based additive, 0.1% (Ki-112), 7), sodium benzoate, 0.1% of fresh weight (SB), or 8) potassium sorbate:EDTA (1:1), 0.1% of fresh weight (PSE). Silage treated with LLB4 had the highest concentration of acetic acid compared with other treatments, and yeasts were undetectable in LLB4 ( 2 cfu/g). Silages treated with SB and PSE had the highest concentrations of water-soluble carbohydrates, the greatest recoveries of DM, and the lowest concentrations of ethanol. Silages treated with B5, SG, and Ki-112 had no effects on fermentation, DM recovery, or aerobic stability. The aerobic stabilities of silages treated with LLB4, SB, and PSE were greatest among all treatments. In yr 2, treatments were: 1) U, 2) LLB4, 3) PLB, 4) PLB at 4×10 5 cfu/g (PLB4), and 5) B5. Silages treated with L. buchneri had greater concentrations of acetic acid but lower concentrations of ethanol than did U- and B5-treated silages. Yeasts were undetected in all silages except in silage treated with B5, which had the poorest aerobic stability of all treatments. Treatments had no effect on DM recovery. Silages treated with PLB, PLB4, and LLB4 remained stable for >210h.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72889-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 233

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Muck, R. E. 1996. A lactic acid bacteria strain to improve aerobics stability of silages. Pages 42-43 in U.S. Dairy Forage Res. Center 1996 Res. Summaries, Madison, WI.
  2. Muck, R. E., and L. Kung, Jr. 1997. Effects of silage additives ensiling. Pages 187-199 in Silage: Field to Feedbunk. NRAES-99. NRAES, Ithaca, NY.
  3. Soderlund, S., K. Bolsen, H. Ilg, and J. Hoover. 1983. Pages 53-57 in Proceedings of Cattlemen's Day 1983. Agricultural Experiment Station. Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
  4. Whitlock, L. A., T. J. Wistuba, M. K. Seifers, R. V. Pope, and K. K. Bolsen. 2000. Effect of level of surface-spoiled silage on the nutritive value of corn silage diets. J. Dairy Sci. 83(Suppl. 1):110. (Abstr.) Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 88, No. 6, 2005

Authors
Kleinschmit, D. H., Schmidt, R. J., & Kung, L.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Kung, L.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2005-06
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
2130-2139
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995346940
Cited by
233
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
13.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Delaware
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Keywords
corn silage, silage additives, Lactobacillus buchneri, Lactobacillus plantarum, aerobic stability, silage fermentation, dry matter recovery, sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, sodium metabisulfite, propionic acid, acetic acid, ethanol, water-soluble carbohydrates, yeast, whole-plant corn
MeSH terms
Zea mays, Edetic Acid, Fermentation, Fungicides, Industrial, Lactobacillus, Silage, Sorbic Acid, Acetic Acid, Sodium Benzoate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review