Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Leg ulcers: a review of their impact on daily life

Persoon, Anke, Heinen, Maud M., Van Der Vleuten, Carien J.M., De Rooij, Michette J., Van De Kerkhof, Peter C.M., Van Achterberg, Theo·2004·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Background. Current nursing care for leg ulcer patients often focuses on wound care and providing compression therapy. Nurses perceive leg ulcer patients as ‘under‐served’ with regard to problems patients experience in daily life. An overview of patient problems is a first and essential step in the development of comprehensive nursing care. Aims and objectives. To gather information about the impact of leg ulcers on patient's daily life as described in quantitative and qualitative studies. Design. Systematic literature review. Methods. Medline and Cinahl databases were searched for venous leg ulcer studies, up to 2002; this was followed by the ‘snowball method’. Studies were selected in accordance with preset criteria. Results. A total of 37 studies was included. All studies report that leg ulcers pose a threat to physical functioning. Furthermore, a negative impact on psychological functioning is reported and, to a lesser degree, on social functioning. Major limitations are pain and immobility, followed by sleep disturbance, lack of energy, limitations in work and leisure activities, worries and frustrations and a lack of self‐esteem. Patients have a significantly poorer quality of life compared with healthy people. Finally, patients report problems with regard to follow‐up treatment. Conclusions. Having a leg ulcer has a major impact on a patient's life. There are indications of under‐treatment of pain. Relevance to clinical practice. Keeping in mind that leg ulceration is notorious for its chronic character, the negative impact on patient's life implies that many patients suffer over longer periods of time. This emphasizes the need to focus on quality of life aspects in patient care. There is much to gain, especially concerning pain and mobility. The development of comprehensive care programmes is essential.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00859.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Persoon, A., Heinen, M. M., Van Der Vleuten, C. J. M., De Rooij, M. J., Van De Kerkhof, P. C. M., & Van Achterberg, T.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-16
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
341-354
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2012582298
Cited by
417
References
0
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leg ulcers: a review of their impact on daily life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00859.x
The paper
Persoon, A., Heinen, M. M., Van Der Vleuten, C. J. M., De Rooij, M. J., Van De Kerkhof, P. C. M., & Van Achterberg, T. (2004). Leg ulcers: a review of their impact on daily life. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00859.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.