The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Leg ulcers: a review of their impact on daily life
Abstract
Background. Current nursing care for leg ulcer patients often focuses on wound care and providing compression therapy. Nurses perceive leg ulcer patients as ‘under‐served’ with regard to problems patients experience in daily life. An overview of patient problems is a first and essential step in the development of comprehensive nursing care. Aims and objectives. To gather information about the impact of leg ulcers on patient's daily life as described in quantitative and qualitative studies. Design. Systematic literature review. Methods. Medline and Cinahl databases were searched for venous leg ulcer studies, up to 2002; this was followed by the ‘snowball method’. Studies were selected in accordance with preset criteria. Results. A total of 37 studies was included. All studies report that leg ulcers pose a threat to physical functioning. Furthermore, a negative impact on psychological functioning is reported and, to a lesser degree, on social functioning. Major limitations are pain and immobility, followed by sleep disturbance, lack of energy, limitations in work and leisure activities, worries and frustrations and a lack of self‐esteem. Patients have a significantly poorer quality of life compared with healthy people. Finally, patients report problems with regard to follow‐up treatment. Conclusions. Having a leg ulcer has a major impact on a patient's life. There are indications of under‐treatment of pain. Relevance to clinical practice. Keeping in mind that leg ulceration is notorious for its chronic character, the negative impact on patient's life implies that many patients suffer over longer periods of time. This emphasizes the need to focus on quality of life aspects in patient care. There is much to gain, especially concerning pain and mobility. The development of comprehensive care programmes is essential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pluye, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., & Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2009) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009 · Cited by 1,119
Compression for venous leg ulcers
O'Meara, S., Cullum, N., Nelson, E. A., & Dumville, J. C. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000265.pub3 · Cited by 929
Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers
O'Meara, S., Al-Kurdi, D., Ologun, Y., Ovington, L. G., Martyn-St James, M., & Richardson, R. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003557.pub5 · Cited by 292
The impact of chronic venous leg ulcers: a systematic review
Green, J., Jester, R., McKinley, R., & Pooler, A. (2014) · Journal of Wound Care · doi:10.12968/jowc.2014.23.12.601 · Cited by 256
Phillips, P., Lumley, E., Duncan, R., Aber, A., Woods, H. B., Jones, G. L., & Michaels, J. (2018) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13465 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Persoon, A., Heinen, M. M., Van Der Vleuten, C. J. M., De Rooij, M. J., Van De Kerkhof, P. C. M., & Van Achterberg, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02-16
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-354
- ISSN
- 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2702
- OpenAlex
- W2012582298
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leg ulcers: a review of their impact on daily life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00859.x
- The paper
- Persoon, A., Heinen, M. M., Van Der Vleuten, C. J. M., De Rooij, M. J., Van De Kerkhof, P. C. M., & Van Achterberg, T. (2004). Leg ulcers: a review of their impact on daily life. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00859.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.