The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of chronic venous leg ulcers: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
• Objective: Chronic venous leg ulcers are common, intractable and often recurrent, but care tends to be wound focused, potentially overlooking the significant impact the condition has on patients' lives. A systematic review was undertaken to explore the factors that impact on the quality of life of patients with chronic venous leg ulceration. • Method: Eligible articles published between 1990 and 2013 were identified via electronic searches of research databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, BNI, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED and HMIC, Cochrane Collaboration database and Google Scholar). • Results: There were 23 studies (11 qualitative and 12 quantitative) that met the inclusion criteria. There were then the subject of a full review. The qualitative studies were collapsed into four core themes: physical, psychological, social implications and the nurse–patient relationship. The quantitative studies were grouped according to the tool applied. The review demonstrated that chronic venous leg ulcers impact negatively upon all areas of daily living. Pain, exudate, odour and the impact on mobility were daily challenges. The ability to engage with everyday functioning was restricted either owing to the ulcer, the dressing or to a self-imposed isolation in response to the impact of symptoms. Depression and low mood were common and yet, despite this, some studies reported that participants remained hopeful. • Conclusion: Studies suggest that chronic venous leg ulceration negatively affects the quality of life of the patient and that such issues receive inadequate attention during current consultations. If such negative implications are to be effectively addressed, key issues need to be considered during every consultation. • Declaration of interest: This study was funded by West Midlands Strategic Health Authority. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Functional evaluation : Barthel index
Mahonery, F. I. (1965) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,762
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration
Higgins, J., Green, S. R., & Higgins, J. (2008) · Cited by 5,544
Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
Tacconelli, E. (2010) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70065-7 · Cited by 3,245
Critical appraisal skills programme
Singh, J. (2013) · Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics · doi:10.4103/0976-500x.107697 · Cited by 2,556
Cantril, H. (1965) · Cited by 2,273
Zubaida, S. D., & Cantril, H. (1967) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/588624 · Cited by 1,496
Cited by
Implementing TIMERS: the race against hard-to-heal wounds
Atkin, L., Bućko, Z., Montero, E. C., Cutting, K., Moffatt, C., Probst, A., Romanelli, M., Schultz, G. S., & Tettelbach, W. (2019) · Journal of Wound Care · doi:10.12968/jowc.2019.28.sup3a.s1 · Cited by 369
Phillips, P., Lumley, E., Duncan, R., Aber, A., Woods, H. B., Jones, G. L., & Michaels, J. (2018) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13465 · Cited by 146
Social participation of people with chronic wounds: a systematic review
Klein, T. M., Andrees, V., Kirsten, N., Protz, K., Augustin, M., & Blome, C. (2021) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.13533 · Cited by 73
Kelly, M., & Gethin, G. (2019) · The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds · doi:10.1177/1534734619850444 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, J., Jester, R., McKinley, R., & Pooler, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Wound Care
- Publisher
- Mark Allen Group
- Published
- 2014-12-02
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 601-612
- ISSN
- 0969-0700 (ISSN-L)
- 2052-2916
- OpenAlex
- W2112049555
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of chronic venous leg ulcers: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12968/jowc.2014.23.12.601
- The paper
- Green, J., Jester, R., McKinley, R., & Pooler, A. (2014). The impact of chronic venous leg ulcers: a systematic review. Journal of Wound Care. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2014.23.12.601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.