Cited by 146Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous DiseasesWound Healing and TreatmentsVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

A systematic review of qualitative research into people’s experiences of living with venous leg ulcers

Phillips, Patrick, Lumley, Elizabeth, Duncan, Rosie, Aber, Ahmed, Woods, Helen Buckley, Jones, Georgina L., Michaels, Jonathan·2018·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim: To systematically identify, evaluate and synthesize qualitative research that examined the symptoms and health‐related quality of life themes that are important from the perspective of patients with venous leg ulceration. Background: Venous leg ulceration is a common chronic condition; the symptoms and associated treatments have a negative effect on health‐related quality of life. Qualitative research methods can provide insight into the personal experiences of patients with venous leg ulceration. Design: Qualitative evidence synthesis (using framework synthesis). Data Sources: Multiple electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psyc INFO and CINAHL were comprehensively searched from inception to November 2015. Review Methods: Systematic identification, quality assessment and synthesis of existing qualitative research were performed; framework synthesis was conducted on included studies. An inductive approach was used and emergent themes were identified. The final stage in the synthesis involved the development of new interpretations. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria; the overall quality of the included studies was good. Four overarching themes were identified; physical impact, psychological impact, social impact and treatment and, in these, further subthemes were identified. Ulcer and treatment‐related pain, as well as odour and exudate appeared to have significant and direct negative effects on quality of life, with additional and cumulative effects on sleep, mobility and mood. Conclusion: The themes identified in this review should be considered by professionals providing services, care and treatment for venous leg ulcer patients and in the selection, or development, of patient‐reported outcome measures for use with this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jan.13465

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, P., Lumley, E., Duncan, R., Aber, A., Woods, H. B., Jones, G. L., & Michaels, J.
Affiliations
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Patrick
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-24
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
550-563
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2757411504
Cited by
146
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research (RPPG‐1210‐12009)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
venous leg ulcers, patient experience, health-related quality of life, chronic wounds, pain, sleep disorders, mobility (physical function), mood, psychological impact, social impact, patient-reported outcome measures, wound care
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Humans, Leg Ulcer, Nurse-Patient Relations, Quality of Life, Social Behavior, Varicose Ulcer, Reproducibility of Results, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review