The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants
Abstract
Summary: 1 Long‐distance dispersal events are biologically very important for plants because they affect colonization probabilities, the probabilities of population persistence in a fragmented habitat, and metapopulation structure. They are, however, very difficult to investigate because of their low frequency. We reviewed the use of molecular markers in the population genetics approach to studying dispersal. With these methods the consequences of long‐distance dispersal are studied, rather than the frequency of the dispersal events themselves. 2 Molecular markers vary, displaying different amounts of variation and different modes of inheritance: they may be either dominant or codominant, and may or may not be subjected to genetic recombination. Use of markers has inspired the development of maximum likelihood techniques that take the evolutionary history of alleles into account while estimating gene flow. 3 Inferring seed dispersal rates from indirect measurements of gene flow involves three steps: (i) quantifying genetic differentiation among populations and using this to estimate the rate of gene flow; (ii) producing a genetic dispersal curve by regressing geographical distance among populations against the amount of gene flow; and (iii) separating seed‐mediated from pollen‐mediated gene flow, by comparing differentiation in nuclear vs. cytoplasmic molecular markers. In this way, potentially very low levels of gene flow can be detected. 4 The indirect approach is based on a number of assumptions. The validity of each assumption should be assessed by independent methods or the estimates of gene flow and dispersal should be mainly used in a comparative context. In metapopulations, with frequent extinction and colonization, the relationship between genetic differentiation and gene flow is not straightforward, and other methods should be used. 5 Highly variable molecular markers, especially microsatellites, have facilitated a direct genetic approach to measuring gene flow, based on parental analyses. 6 The population genetic approach provides different information about dispersal than ecological methods. Thus population genetic and ecological methods may supplement each other, and together lead to a better insight into the dispersal process than either of the methods on its own.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · Cited by 13,929
Cited by
Methods for estimating long‐distance dispersal
Nathan, R., Perry, G., Cronin, J. T., Strand, A. E., & Cain, M. L. (2003) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12146.x · Cited by 499
Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations
Charlesworth, D. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1296 · Cited by 466
COMPARATIVE SEED SHADOWS OF BIRD-, MONKEY-, AND WIND-DISPERSED TREES
Clark, C. J., Poulsen, J. R., Bolker, B. M., Connor, E. F., & Parker, V. T. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-1325 · Cited by 263
Molecular Markers in the Management and Improvement of Forest Genetic Resources
Mohammad, N., Dahayat, A., & Agrahari, H. (2024) · Biotechnological Approaches for Sustaining Forest Trees and Their Products · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4363-6_7 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Ouborg, N. J., Piquot, Y., & Van Groenendael, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 551-568
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2032487465
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00389.x
- The paper
- Ouborg, N. J., Piquot, Y., & Van Groenendael, J. M. (1999). Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00389.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.