The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability and validity of the PAS‐ADD Checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability
Open accessAbstract
The PAS‐ADD Checklist is a screening instrument specifically designed to help staff recognize mental health problems in the people with intellectual disability for whom they care, and to make informed referral decisions. The instrument consists of a life‐events checklist and 29 symptom items scored on a four‐point scale. Scores are combined to provide three threshold scores. The crossing of any of these thresholds indicates the need for a fuller assessment. The items are worded in everyday language, making the Checklist suitable for use by individuals who do not have a background in psychopathology. The present paper presents the results of a number of studies evaluating the reliability and validity of the Checklist. Factor analysis of Checklists completed on a community sample of 201 individuals yielded eight factors, of which seven were readily interpretable in diagnostic terms. Internal consistency of the scales was generally acceptable. Inter‐rarer reliability in respect to individual items gave a fairly low average Kappa of 0.42. However, agreement on case identification, the main purpose of the Checklist, was quite good, with 83% of the decision being in agreement. Validity in relation to clinical opinion was also satisfactory, case detection rising appropriately with the clinically judged severity of disorder. The PAS‐ADD Checklist is published and distributed by the Hester Adrian Research Centre, Manchester, England, from where further information and order forms are available on request.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · Cited by 38,430
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0031333 · Cited by 1,751
Cited by
Psychiatric Comorbidity and Medication Use in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Buck, T. R., Viskochil, J., Farley, M., Coon, H., McMahon, W. M., Morgan, J., & Bilder, D. A. (2014) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2170-2 · Cited by 323
“Psychiatric Diagnostic Tool The Mini PAS-ADD Clinical Interview is an 86 item, abbreviated version of the Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adults with Developmental Disability (PAS-ADD; Moss et al. 1998), and designed for use with adults who have ID (Prosser et al. 1998).”
MethodCBT for People with Intellectual Disabilities: Emerging Evidence, Cognitive Ability and IQ Effects
Taylor, J. L., Lindsay, W. R., & Willner, P. (2008) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465808004906 · Cited by 160
Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials in Down Syndrome
Esbensen, A. J., Hooper, S. R., Fidler, D., Hartley, S. L., Edgin, J., d'Ardhuy, X. L., Capone, G., Conners, F. A., Mervis, C. B., Abbeduto, L., et al. (2017) · American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-122.3.247 · Cited by 153
Faraone, S. V. (2005) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-005-0429-z · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Moss, S., Prosser, H., Costello, H., Simpson, N., Patel, P., Rowe, S., Turner, S., & Hatton, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-183
- ISSN
- 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2788
- OpenAlex
- W1970445205
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability and validity of the PAS‐ADD Checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00116.x
- The paper
- Moss, S., Prosser, H., Costello, H., Simpson, N., Patel, P., Rowe, S., Turner, S., & Hatton, C. (1998). Reliability and validity of the PAS‐ADD Checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00116.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.