The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Behavioural knowledge, causal beliefs and self‐efficacy as predictors of special educators’ emotional reactions to challenging behaviours
Abstract
Background Theoretical models and emerging empirical data suggest that the emotional reactions of staff to challenging behaviours may affect their responses to challenging behaviours and their psychological well‐being. However, there have been few studies focusing on factors related to staff emotional reactions. Methods Seventy staff working in educational environments with children with intellectual disability and/or autism completed a self‐report questionnaire that measured demographic factors, behavioural causal beliefs, behavioural knowledge, perceived self‐efficacy, and emotional reactions to challenging behaviours. Results Regression analyses revealed that behavioural causal beliefs were a positive predictor, and self‐efficacy and behavioural knowledge were negative predictors of negative emotional reactions to challenging behaviours. Staff with formal qualifications also reported more negative emotional reactions. No other demographic factors emerged as significant predictors. Conclusions The results suggest that behavioural causal beliefs, low self‐efficacy and low behavioural knowledge may make staff vulnerable to experiencing negative emotional reactions to challenging behaviours. Researchers and clinicians need to address these issues in staff who work with people with challenging behaviours.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
HOLDEN, B., & GITLESEN, J. (2006) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2005.06.001 · Cited by 366
Keen, D., Couzens, D., Muspratt, S., & Rodger, S. (2010) · Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2009.09.009 · Cited by 271
Staff Stress and Burnout in Intellectual Disability Services: Work Stress Theory and its Application
Devereux, J., Hastings, R., & Noone, S. (2009) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00509.x · Cited by 124
Self-citationKurz, A. S., Bethay, J. S., & Ladner-Graham, J. M. (2014) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.06.003 · Cited by 21
Hills, D., Robinson, T., Kelly, B., & Heathcote, S. (2010) · Education for Health · doi:10.4103/1357-6283.101503 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Hastings, R. P., & Brown, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 144-150
- ISSN
- 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2788
- OpenAlex
- W2022460519
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Behavioural knowledge, causal beliefs and self‐efficacy as predictors of special educators’ emotional reactions to challenging behaviours. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00378.x
- The paper
- Hastings, R. P., & Brown, T. (2002). Behavioural knowledge, causal beliefs and self‐efficacy as predictors of special educators’ emotional reactions to challenging behaviours. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00378.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.