The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome
Abstract
Abstract. Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, Kahan T, von Arbin M (Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden). Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med 2001; 249: 413–422. Objectives. The natural course of aphasia in unselected, consecutive stroke patients is not well established. We investigated morbidity, mortality and recovery for different types of aphasia in consecutive unselected aphasic patients with acute stroke. Setting and subjects. In 119 aphasic patients, the type and degree of aphasia were assessed acutely and at 3, 6 and 18 months after stroke onset, using Reinvang’s ‘Grunntest for afasi’ and Amsterdam‐Nijmegen‐Everyday‐Language‐Test. Results. About one‐third of patients with acute stroke had presented with aphasia. Mortality among the aphasic patients during the 18‐month follow‐up was twice that in non‐aphasics (36 vs. 16%). Presence of atrial fibrillation was associated with poorer prognosis. At 18 months, 24% of the 119 aphasic patients had recovered completely, 43% still had significant aphasia, and 21% had died. The proportion with global aphasia decreased from almost 25% acutely to a few per cent after 18 months, that with Wernicke’s aphasia from 25% to less than 10%, whereas conduction aphasia increased from 13 to 23% during follow‐up. Among those with initial mild aphasia, 70% recovered completely. Great improvement was observed in patients with initial low degree of speech function. Younger patients recovered to a greater extent than older patients. Conclusion. The high long‐term mortality among aphasics may be seen as an indirect sign of advanced cardiovascular disease. A combination of different and adjusted aphasia tests provided the possibility to assess almost all acute aphasic patients. Irrespective of type and degree of aphasia, great improvements were seen in almost all aphasic patients. Even patients with severe speech impairment have a considerable potential for recovery, particularly in the first 3 months after stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke
Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., & Campbell, P. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000425.pub4 · Cited by 1,159
Engelter, S. T., Gostynski, M., Papa, S., Frei, M., Born, C., Ajdacic-Gross, V., Gutzwiller, F., & Lyrer, P. A. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000221815.64093.8c · Cited by 688
Poststroke Aphasia Frequency, Recovery, and Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Flowers, H. L., Skoretz, S. A., Silver, F. L., Rochon, E., Fang, J., Flamand-Roze, C., & Martino, R. (2016) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.006 · Cited by 432
Incidence and Profile of Inpatient Stroke-Induced Aphasia in Ontario, Canada
Dickey, L., Kagan, A., Lindsay, M. P., Fang, J., Rowland, A., & Black, S. (2010) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.020 · Cited by 297
Improvement in Aphasia Scores After Stroke Is Well Predicted by Initial Severity
Lazar, R. M., Minzer, B., Antoniello, D., Festa, J. R., Krakauer, J. W., & Marshall, R. S. (2010) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.109.577338 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Laska, A. C., Hellblom, A., Murray, V., Kahan, T., & Von Arbin, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05-14
- Volume
- 249
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 413-422
- ISSN
- 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2796
- OpenAlex
- W2019622055
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2796.2001.00812.x
- The paper
- Laska, A. C., Hellblom, A., Murray, V., Kahan, T., & Von Arbin, M. (2001). Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. Journal of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2796.2001.00812.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.