CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 120Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsHormonal Regulation and HypertensionNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adrenal incidentaloma—experience of a standardized diagnostic programme in the Swedish prospective study.

Open access
Bülow, B., Ahrén, B., the Swedish Research Council Study Group of Endocrine Abdominal Tumours·2002·Journal of Internal Medicine
DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.01028.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the 5-year experience of a diagnostic programme for adrenal incidentaloma with special emphasis to diagnose hormonally active and malignant lesions. DESIGN: A prospective study in which new cases of adrenal incidentalomas in Sweden have been evaluated by a standardized diagnostic protocol between January 1996 and July 2001. SETTING: Thirty-three different Swedish hospitals have contributed with cases. SUBJECTS: A total of 381 patients (217 females, 164 males) with adrenal incidentalomas were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostic procedures were undertaken according to a standardized programme. Operation was recommended if the incidentaloma had a size of more than 3-4 cm or if there was a suspicion of a hypersecreting tumour. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The size of the incidentaloma, clinical characteristics of the patients and results of biochemical diagnostic tests were registered. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 64 years (18-84 years), and the median size of the incidentalomas was 3 cm (1-20 cm). A total of 85(22%) patients were operated. Twenty of these patients were diagnosed with a benign hypersecreting tumour and 14 with a malignant tumour. Fourteen of 15 operated patients with diagnosed pheochromocytoma had elevated 24-h urinary noradrenaline and all of the patients operated because of a biochemical suspicion of aldosterone or cortisol hypersecretion (n = 6) were found to have adrenal adenomas. Of the 14 operated patients with malignant diseases, 10 were adrenal carcinomas (median size 10 cm; range 4-16 cm). In a multiple logistic regression model, incidentaloma size was significantly associated with the risk of a malignant tumour (P = 0.009), and there was a tendency of an association between age/male sex and the risk of a malignancy (both, P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: In this Swedish multicentre study of 381 cases with adrenal incidentalomas, 5% had benign hypersecreting tumours and nearly 4% had malignant tumours. The results of the biochemical diagnostic tests used had a high compatibility with the histological diagnosis found at operation in the patients with hypersecreting tumours. Tumour size, male gender and high age were predictive for the risk of a malignant tumour. A follow-up of the patients is warranted in order to establish whether there are undiscovered cases of malignant or hypersecreting tumours amongst the nonoperated patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.01028.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1210/jc.77.4.885 · DOI
  2. 10.1210/jc.79.6.1532 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1210/jc.85.4.1440 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bülow, B., Ahrén, B., & the Swedish Research Council Study Group of Endocrine Abdominal Tumours
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Bülow, B.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09
Volume
252
Issue
3
Pages
239-246
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
DOI
10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.01028.x
OpenAlex
W2095171413
Cited by
120
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 18 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Keywords
adrenal incidentaloma, adrenocortical carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, adrenal adenoma, tumor size, risk factors for malignancy, aldosterone, cortisol, surgical management
MeSH terms
Adenoma, Adolescent, Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biopsy, Carcinoma, Child, Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pheochromocytoma, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Sex Factors, Sweden, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Disease Progression, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review