Cited by 386Marine animal studies overviewMarine and fisheries researchWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Baleen whales: conservation issues and the status of the most endangered populations

Clapham, Phillip J., Young, Sharon B., Brownell, Robert L.·1999·Mammal Review

Abstract

Most species of baleen whales were subject to intensive overexploitation by commercial whaling in this and previous centuries, and many populations were reduced to small fractions of their original sizes. Here, we review the status of baleen whale stocks, with an emphasis on those that are known or thought to be critically endangered. Current data suggest that, of the various threats potentially affecting baleen whales, only entanglement in fishing gear and ship strikes may be significant at the population level, and then only in those populations which are already at critically low abundance. The impact of some problems (vessel harassment, and commercial or aboriginal whaling) is at present probably minor. For others (contaminants, habitat degradation, disease), existing data either indicate no immediate cause for concern, or are insufficient to permit an assessment. While the prospect for many baleen whales appears good, there are notable exceptions; populations that are of greatest concern are those suffering from low abundance and associated problems, including (in some cases) anthropogenic mortality. These include: all Northern Right Whales Eubalaena glacialis, Bowhead Whales Balaena mysticetus of the Okhotsk Sea and various eastern Arctic populations, western Gray Whales Eschrichtius robustus, and probably many Blue Whale Balaenoptera musculus populations. We review the status of these populations and, where known, the issues potentially affecting their recovery. Althou…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2907.1999.00035.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clapham, P. J., Young, S. B., & Brownell, R. L.
Affiliations
Humane World for Animals (US)
Venue
Mammal Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-03
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
37-62
ISSN
  • 0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2907
OpenAlex
W2013835428
Cited by
386
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mammal Review (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Wildlife Fund
  • National Marine Fisheries Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
baleen whales, whale conservation, population status, commercial whaling, fishing gear entanglement, ship strikes, contaminants, habitat degradation, northern right whale, bowhead whale, gray whale, blue whale, humpback whale, southern right whale, population recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review