Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 713

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness of problem‐based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts

Norman, Geoffrey R, Schmidt, Henk G·2000·Medical Education

Abstract

In a recent review article, Colliver concluded that there was no convincing evidence that problem‐based learning was more effective than conventional methods. He then went on to lay part of the blame on cognitive psychology, claiming that ‘the theory is weak, its theoretical concepts are imprecise... the basic research is contrived and ad hoc ’. This paper challenges these claims and presents evidence that (a) cognitive research is not contrived and irrelevant, (b) curriculum level interventions are doomed to fail and (c) education needs more theory‐based research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00749.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 713

Metadata

Authors
Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G.
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-09
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
721-728
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2139499599
Cited by
713
References
4
FWCI
117.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of problem‐based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00749.x
The paper
Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (2000). Effectiveness of problem‐based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00749.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.