The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures
Abstract
Context Performing a clinical procedure requires the integration of technical clinical skills with effective communication skills. However, these skills are often taught separately. Objectives To explore the feasibility and benefits of a new conceptual model for integrated skills teaching. Design A qualitative observation and interview‐based study of undergraduate medical students. Methodology Medical students performed technical and communication skills in realistic clinical scenarios (urinary catherization and wound closure), using latex models connected to simulated patients (SPs). Procedures were observed, videorecorded and assessed by tutors from an adjoining room. Students received immediate feedback from tutors and SPs, before engaging in a process of individual feedback through private review of their videotapes. Group interviews explored the response of students, SPs and tutors. Data were analysed using standard qualitative techniques. Subjects Fifty‐one undergraduate students were recruited from the Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London. Results The scenarios provided a realistic simulation of two common clinical situations and proved feasible in terms of time, facilities and resources within this institution. Students found the opportunity to integrate communication and technical skills valuable, challenging and an appropriate learning experience. Immediate feedback was especially highly valued. Some students found difficulty integrating technical and communications skills, but benefited from conducting two procedures in the same session. Conclusion The integrated model was feasible and was perceived to be valuable. Benefits include the opportunity to integrate, within a safe environment, skills which are often taught separately. Promoting reflective practice may enable the successful transfer of these integrated skills to other procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564
Cited by
The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions
Bradley, P. (2006) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02394.x · Cited by 1,046
Simulation‐based learning in nurse education: systematic review
Cant, R. P., & Cooper, S. J. (2010) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05240.x · Cited by 984
Evaluating Clinical Simulations for Learning Procedural Skills: A Theory-Based Approach
Kneebone, R. (2005) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200506000-00006 · Cited by 423
Self-citationSimulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship
Kneebone, R. L., Scott, W., Darzi, A., & Horrocks, M. (2004) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01959.x · Cited by 422
Self-citationThe Evolution of Simulation and Its Contribution to Competency
Decker, S., Sportsman, S., Puetz, L., & Billings, L. (2008) · The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing · doi:10.3928/00220124-20080201-06 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Kneebone, R., Kidd, J., Nestel, D., Asvall, S., Paraskeva, P., & Darzi, A.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 628-634
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2046204413
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01261.x
- The paper
- Kneebone, R., Kidd, J., Nestel, D., Asvall, S., Paraskeva, P., & Darzi, A. (2002). An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01261.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.