The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship
Abstract
Introduction This discussion paper argues for a creative synthesis between simulation and clinical practice, where an iterative process of continual interaction ensures that skills are learned and reinforced within the context of everyday professional life. Background Evidence is mounting that long‐established approaches to surgical training are no longer acceptable in the current ethical and professional climate. This paper considers alternatives to the traditional approach of ‘learning by doing’ in a clinical context, focusing on recent developments in the technology of simulation and virtual reality. Clinical expertise is a complex phenomenon and no single theory can account for its acquisition. After a brief contextualising overview, Vygotsky's ‘zone of proximal development’ is proposed as a conceptual framework for task‐based surgical learning that takes place within skills laboratories. The discussion is located within a wider context of educational theory, drawing on current thinking about situated learning and apprenticeship. The notion of ‘legitimate peripheral participation’ in a complex professional environment places technical skill alongside a range of other competencies that are necessary to safe practice. Conclusions Simulation offers a safe environment within which learners can repeatedly practise a range of clinical skills without endangering patients. Comprehensive simulated environments allow a move away from isolated tasks to more complex clinical situations, recreating many of the challenges of real life. Such simulations, however, can operate in isolation from their clinical context, ignoring the learning needs of individuals within a real health care environment. To realise its full potential as a learning aid, simulation must be used alongside clinical practice and linked closely with it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity
Wenger, E. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803932 · Cited by 23,500
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564
Factors That Influence Skill Decay and Retention: A Quantitative Review and Analysis
Arthur Jr., W., Bennett Jr., W., Stanush, P. L., & McNelly, T. L. (1998) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1101_3 · Cited by 664
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-5933 · Cited by 582
Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education
Regehr, G., & Norman, G. R. (1996) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199609000-00015 · Cited by 394
An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures
Kneebone, R., Kidd, J., Nestel, D., Asvall, S., Paraskeva, P., & Darzi, A. (2002) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01261.x · Cited by 290
Self-citationHamdorf, J. M., & Hall, J. C. (2000) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01327.x · Cited by 250
Taylor, F., Edwards, R., Hanson, A., Raggatt, P. T. F., Raggatt, P. T. F., Edwards, R., & Small, N. (1996) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121928 · Cited by 143
Cited by
Virtual and augmented reality applications in medicine: analysis of the scientific literature
Yeung, A. W. K., Tosevska, A., Klager, E., Eibensteiner, F., Laxar, D., Stoyanov, J., Glisic, M., Zeiner, S., Kulnik, S. T., Crutzen, R., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25499 · Cited by 428
Simulation-based mastery learning to facilitate transition to nursing practice
Tan, K.-A. Z. Y., Seah, B., Wong, L. F., Lee, C. C. S., Goh, H. S., & Liaw, S. Y. (2022) · Nurse Educator · doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000001224 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Kneebone, R. L., Scott, W., Darzi, A., & Horrocks, M.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1095-1102
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W1977801102
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 6.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01959.x
- The paper
- Kneebone, R. L., Scott, W., Darzi, A., & Horrocks, M. (2004). Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01959.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.