The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions
Abstract
Introduction Clinical simulation is on the point of having a significant impact on health care education across professional boundaries and in both the undergraduate and postgraduate arenas. Scope of simulation The use of simulation spans a spectrum of sophistication, from the simple reproduction of isolated body parts through to complex human interactions portrayed by simulated patients or high‐fidelity human patient simulators replicating whole body appearance and variable physiological parameters. Growth of simulation After a prolonged gestation, recent advances have made available affordable technologies that permit the reproduction of clinical events with sufficient fidelity to permit the engagement of learners in a realistic and meaningful way. At the same time, reforms in undergraduate and postgraduate education, combined with political and societal pressures, have promoted a safety‐conscious culture where simulation provides a means of risk‐free learning in complex, critical or rare situations. Furthermore, the importance of team‐based and interprofessional approaches to learning and health care can be promoted. Conclusion However, at the present time the quantity and quality of research in this area of medical education is limited. Such research is needed to enable educators to justify the cost and effort involved in simulation and to confirm the benefit of this mode of learning in terms of the outcomes achieved through this process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1983) · Cited by 33,192
To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System
(2000) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/9728 · Cited by 14,044
Educating the reflective practitioner
Schön, D. A. (1987) · Cited by 11,326
To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System
Hendee, W. R. (2001) · Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1016/s1051-0443(01)70072-3 · Cited by 10,103
Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2009) · Cited by 4,720
Barry Issenberg, S., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500046924 · Cited by 3,966
The future vision of simulation in health care
Gaba, D. M. (2004) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.009878 · Cited by 1,934
Simulation-Based Medical Education: An Ethical Imperative
Ziv, A., Wolpe, P. R., Small, S. D., & Glick, S. (2003) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200308000-00006 · Cited by 1,008
Low‐ to high‐fidelity simulation – a continuum of medical education?
Maran, N. J., & Glavin, R. J. (2003) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.37.s1.9.x · Cited by 943
Coping with complexity: educating for capability
Fraser, S. W., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7316.799 · Cited by 889
Cited by
The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review
Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Okatta, A. U., Amaechi, E. C., Elendu, T. C., Ezeh, C. P., & Elendu, I. D. (2024) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000038813 · Cited by 994
Reconsidering Fidelity in Simulation-Based Training
Hamstra, S. J., Brydges, R., Hatala, R., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D. A. (2014) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000130 · Cited by 624
The history of medical simulation
Rosen, K. R. (2008) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.12.004 · Cited by 600
Kononowicz, A. A., Zary, N., Edelbring, S., Corral, J., & Hege, I. (2015) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0296-3 · Cited by 203
You're judged all the time: students' views on professionalism: a multicentre study
Finn, G., Garner, J., & Sawdon, M. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03743.x · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradley, P.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-02-17
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 254-262
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2053013149
- Cited by
- 1,046
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 21.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02394.x
- The paper
- Bradley, P. (2006). The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02394.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.