The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relationship between competence and performance: implications for assessing practice performance
Abstract
Objective This paper aims to describe current views of the relationship between competence and performance and to delineate some of the implications of the distinctions between the two areas for the purpose of assessing doctors in practice. Methods During a 2‐day closed session, the authors, using their wide experiences in this domain, defined the problem and the context, discussed the content and set up a new model. This was developed further by e‐mail correspondence over a 6‐month period. Results Competency‐based assessments were defined as measures of what doctors do in testing situations, while performance‐based assessments were defined as measures of what doctors do in practice. The distinction between competency‐based and performance‐based methods leads to a three‐stage model for assessing doctors in practice. The first component of the model proposed is a screening test that would identify doctors at risk. Practitioners who ‘pass’ the screen would move on to a continuous quality improvement process aimed at raising the general level of performance. Practitioners deemed to be at risk would undergo a more detailed assessment process focused on rigorous testing, with poor performers targeted for remediation or removal from practice. Conclusion We propose a new model, designated the Cambridge Model, which extends and refines Miller's pyramid. It inverts his pyramid, focuses exclusively on the top two tiers, and identifies performance as a product of competence, the influences of the individual (e.g. health, relationships), and the influences of the system (e.g. facilities, practice time). The model provides a basis for understanding and designing assessments of practice performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance
Miller, G. E. (1990) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045 · Cited by 4,883
Davis, D. A. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530090032018 · Cited by 1,763
Use of Peer Ratings to Evaluate Physician Performance
Ramsey, P. G. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500130069034 · Cited by 347
Rethans, J. J., Sturmans, F., Drop, R., van der Vleuten, C., & Hobus, P. (1991) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.303.6814.1377 · Cited by 201
Self-citationRam, P., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Rethans, J., Schouten, B., Hobma, S., & Grol, R. P. T. M. (1999) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00280.x · Cited by 74
Self-citationRecertification in the United States
Norcini, J. J. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7218.1183 · Cited by 66
Self-citationSouthgate, L. J., Cox, J., David, T. J., Hatch, D., Howes, A., Johnson, N., Jolly, B. C., Macdonald, E., McAvoy, P. A., McCrorie, P., et al. (2001) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00001.x · Cited by 65
Self-citationDefensible assessment of the competency of the practicing physician.
Cunnington, J. P. W., Hanna, E., Turnhbull, J., Kaigas, T., & Norman, G. R. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 57
Southgate, L. J., & Pringle, M. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7218.1180 · Cited by 53
Self-citationSheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL): performance assessment using outpatient letters
Crossley, J., Howe, A., Newble, D. I., Jolly, B. C., & Davies, H. A. (2001) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.01065.x · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Cited by
Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes
Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Schuwirth, L. W. T. (2005) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x · Cited by 1,268
Vollmar, H. C., Mayer, H., Ostermann, T., Butzlaff, M. E., Sandars, J. E., Wilm, S., & Rieger, M. A. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-1 · Cited by 693
Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review
Miller, A., & Archer, J. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c5064 · Cited by 461
E-learning for health professionals
Vaona, A., Banzi, R., Kwag, K. H., Rigon, G., Cereda, D., Pecoraro, V., Tramacere, I., & Moja, L. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011736.pub2 · Cited by 397
The promise of competency-based education in the health professions for improving global health
Gruppen, L. D., Mangrulkar, R. S., & Kolars, J. C. (2012) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/1478-4491-10-43 · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Authors
- Rethans, J., Norcini, J. J., Barón‐Maldonado, M., Blackmore, D., Jolly, B. C., LaDuca, T., Lew, S., Page, G. G., & Southgate, L. H.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 901-909
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W1969299479
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 11.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between competence and performance: implications for assessing practice performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01316.x
- The paper
- Rethans, J., Norcini, J. J., Barón‐Maldonado, M., Blackmore, D., Jolly, B. C., LaDuca, T., Lew, S., Page, G. G., & Southgate, L. H. (2002). The relationship between competence and performance: implications for assessing practice performance. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01316.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.