Cited by 4,883Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsCompetency Development and Evaluation

The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance

Miller, G E·1990·Academic Medicine

Abstract

Log in or Register Subscribe to journalSubscribe Get new issue alertsGet alerts Enter your Email address: Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without your express consent. For more information, please refer to our Privacy Policy. Subscribe to eTOC Secondary Logo Journal Logo All Articles Images Videos Podcasts Blogs Advanced Search Toggle navigation Subscribe Register Login Articles & Issues Current IssuePrevious IssuesPublished Ahead-of-Print Collections Editorials of Laura Weiss Roberts, MD, MAAM Last PageCOVID-19 and Medical EducationAddressing Race and Racism in Medical EducationeBooksView All For Authors Submit a ManuscriptInformation for AuthorsLanguage Editing ServicesAuthor Permissions Journal Info About the JournalAbout the AAMCJournal MastheadSubmit a ManuscriptAdvertising InformationSubscription ServicesReprints and Back IssuesClassified AdsRights and PermissionsFor ReviewersFor MediaFor Trainees All Articles Images Videos Podcasts Blogs Advanced Search

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assessment authenticity is strengthened by requiring students to demonstrate practical skills in laboratory scenarios mirroring professional practice, while direct observation provides higher validity by evaluating actual competencies rather than written communication abilities.

    “Assessment authenticity is strengthened by requiring students to demonstrate practical skills in laboratory scenarios mirroring professional practice, while direct observation provides higher validity by evaluating actual competencies rather than written communication abilities [15–17].”
  • Based on Miller's Pyramid, 92.22% accuracy on MedQA benchmarks is a measure of the 'Knows' and 'Knows How' foundational levels of medical knowledge, rather than a surrogate for the 'Shows How' or 'Does' levels required for dynamic, real-world patient interactions.

    “based on Miller’s Pyramid of Clinical Competence, it is critical to recognize that a 92.22% accuracy on MedQA benchmarks is a measure of the ‘Knows’ and ‘Knows How’ foundational levels of medical knowledge, rather than a surrogate for the ‘Shows How’ or ‘Does’ levels, which is required for dynamic, real-world patient interactions [40].”
  • Miller's Pyramid of Clinical Competence serves as a valuable framework, emphasizing progression through four levels: 'knows,' 'knows how,' 'shows how,' and 'does.'

    “Miller's Pyramid of Clinical Competence [49,50] serves as a valuable framework, emphasizing progression through four levels: 'knows,' 'knows how,' 'shows how,' and 'does.'”
  • Miller's pyramid is the most frequently encountered variant of Bloom's work in medical education and can guide curriculum planning and assessment.

    “In medical education, the most frequently encountered is Miller's pyramid (Kolb 1984).(Miller, 1990; Figure 3), which can be used as a guide for planning and assessing within a curriculum.”
  • Assessment drives learning.

    “it is widely asserted that ''assessment drives learning'' (Miller 1990)”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, G. E.
Corresponding author
Miller, G E
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
1990-09
Volume
65
Issue
9
Pages
S63-7
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991635648
Cited by
4,883
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 326 · 2025: 269 · 2024: 290 · 2023: 308 · 2022: 332 · 2021: 330 · 2020: 302 · 2019: 297 · 2018: 252 · 2017: 257 · 2016: 237 · 2015: 243 · 2014: 211 · 2013: 179 · 2012: 175
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Competency Development and Evaluation
Keywords
clinical skills assessment, competency assessment, performance evaluation (human resources), medical education, clinical competence
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Cognition, Educational Measurement, Humans, Patients, Role Playing, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review