Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Crisis resource management training for an anaesthesia faculty: a new approach to continuing education

Blum, Richard H, Raemer, Daniel B, Carroll, John S, Sunder, Neelakantan, Felstein, David M, Cooper, Jeffrey B·2004·Medical Education

Abstract

Background Human error and system failures continue to play a substantial role in adverse outcomes in health care. Anaesthesia crisis resource management addresses many patient safety issues by teaching behavioural skills for critical events but it has not been systematically utilized to teach experienced faculty. Methods An anaesthesia crisis resource management course was created for the faculty of our medical school's anaesthesia teaching programmes. The course objectives were to understand and improve participants' proficiency in crisis resource management (CRM) skills and to learn skills for debriefing residents after critical events. Through surveys, measurement objectives assessed acceptance, utility and need for recurrent training immediately post‐course. These were measured again approximately 1 year later along with self‐perceived changes in the management of difficult or critical events. Results The highly rated course was well received in terms of overall course quality, realism, debriefings and didactic presentation. Course usefulness, CRM principles, debriefing skills and communication were highly rated immediately post‐course and 1 year later. Approximately half of the faculty staff reported a difficult or critical event following the course; of nine self‐reported CRM performance criteria surveyed all claimed improvement in their CRM non‐technical skills. Conclusions A unique and highly rated anaesthesia faculty course was created; participation made the faculty staff eligible for malpractice premium reductions. Self‐reported CRM behaviours in participants' most significant difficult or critical events indicated an improvement in performance. These data provide indirect evidence supporting the contention that this type of training should be more widely promoted, although more definitive measures of improved outcomes are needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01696.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Blum, R. H., Raemer, D. B., Carroll, J. S., Sunder, N., Felstein, D. M., & Cooper, J. B.
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
45-55
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W1994099116
Cited by
176
References
2
FWCI
20.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crisis resource management training for an anaesthesia faculty: a new approach to continuing education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01696.x
The paper
Blum, R. H., Raemer, D. B., Carroll, J. S., Sunder, N., Felstein, D. M., & Cooper, J. B. (2004). Crisis resource management training for an anaesthesia faculty: a new approach to continuing education. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01696.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.