Cited by 1,068Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorPsychometric Methodologies and TestingBusiness Strategies and Management Research

Understanding Self-Report Bias in Organizational Behavior Research

Donaldson, Stewart I., Grant-Vallone, Elisa J.·2002·Journal of Business and Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1019637632584

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donaldson, S. I., & Grant-Vallone, E. J.
Affiliations
Claremont Graduate University (US)
Corresponding author
Donaldson, Stewart I.
Venue
Journal of Business and Psychology
Published
2002-12
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
245-260
ISSN
  • 0889-3268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-353X
OpenAlex
W2156580739
Cited by
1,068
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 47
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business and Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship - Claremont (Claremont Colleges) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
Keywords
self-report bias, response bias, method effects, measurement validity, multitrait-multimethod design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review