Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic diversity in an endangered alpine plant,Eryngium alpinum L. (Apiaceae), inferred from amplified fragment length polymorphism markers

Gaudeul, M., Taberlet, P., Till‐Bottraud, I.·2000·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

Eryngium alpinum L. is an endangered species found across the European Alps. In order to obtain base‐line data for the conservation of this species, we investigated levels of genetic diversity within and among 14 populations from the French Alps. We used the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) technique with three primer pairs and scored a total of 62 unambiguous, polymorphic markers in 327 individuals. Because AFLP markers are dominant, within‐population genetic structure (e.g.FIS) could not be assessed. Analyses based either on the assumption of random‐mating or on complete selfing lead to very similar results. Diversity levels within populations were relatively high (mean Nei’s expected heterozygosity = 0.198; mean Shannon index = 0.283), and a positive correlation was detected between both genetic diversity measurements and population size (Spearman rank correlation:P = 0.005 and P = 0.002, respectively). Moreover,FST values and exact tests of differentiation revealed high differentiation among populations (mean pairwise FST = 0.40), which appeared to be independent of geographical distance (nonsignificant Mantel test). Founder events during postglacial colonizations and/or bottlenecks are proposed to explain this high but random genetic differentiation. By contrast, we detected a pattern of isolation by distance within populations and valleys. Predominant local gene flow by pollen or seed is probably responsible for this pattern. Concerning the management of E. alpinum, the high genetic differentiation leads us to recommend the conservation of a maximum number of populations. This study demonstrates that AFLP markers enable a quick and reliable assessment of intraspecific genetic variability in conservation genetics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01063.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Metadata

Authors
Gaudeul, M., Taberlet, P., & Till‐Bottraud, I.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-10
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
1625-1637
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2028466018
Cited by
295
References
35
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic diversity in an endangered alpine plant,Eryngium alpinum L. (Apiaceae), inferred from amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01063.x
The paper
Gaudeul, M., Taberlet, P., & Till‐Bottraud, I. (2000). Genetic diversity in an endangered alpine plant,Eryngium alpinum L. (Apiaceae), inferred from amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01063.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.