The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification
Abstract
Using a molecular barcode, derived from single‐specimen polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing of the 5′ segment of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU) gene, we have developed a molecular operational taxonomic unit (MOTU) scheme for soil nematodes. Individual specimens were considered to belong to the same MOTU when the sequenced segment of 450 bases was > 99.5% identical. A Scottish upland Agrostis‐Festuca grassland soil was sampled, using both culture‐based and random selection methods. One hundred and sixty‐six cultured isolates were sequenced, and clustered into five MOTU. From 74 randomly sampled individuals across the study site, 19 MOTU were defined. A subsequent sample of 18 individuals from a single subplot contained eight MOTU, four of which were unique to the single subplot sample. Interestingly, seven of these MOTU were not present in the culture‐independent sampling. Overall, a total of 23 MOTU were defined from only 240 sequences. Many MOTU could readily be assigned to classical, morphologically defined taxonomic units using a database of SSU sequences from named nematode species. The MOTU technique allows a rapid assessment of nematode taxon diversity in soils. Correlation with a database of sequences from known species offers a route to application of the technique in ecological surveys addressing biological as well as genetic diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
Cited by
ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primary species delimitation
PUILLANDRE, N., LAMBERT, A., BROUILLET, S., & ACHAZ, G. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05239.x · Cited by 3,324
Valentini, A., Pompanon, F., & Taberlet, P. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011 · Cited by 1,122
Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding
Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Pompanon, F., Gielly, L., Miquel, C., Valentini, A., Vermat, T., Corthier, G., Brochmann, C., & Willerslev, E. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkl938 · Cited by 1,079
Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians
Vences, M., Thomas, M., van der Meijden, A., Chiari, Y., & Vieites, D. R. (2005) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-2-5 · Cited by 600
DNA barcodes for biosecurity: invasive species identification
Armstrong, K. F., & Ball, S. L. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1713 · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Floyd, R., Abebe, E., Papert, A., & Blaxter, M.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 839-850
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2160388710
- Cited by
- 749
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01485.x
- The paper
- Floyd, R., Abebe, E., Papert, A., & Blaxter, M. (2002). Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01485.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.